Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Unearthed Arcana Playtest Includes Barbarian, Druid, and Monk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9221309" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>Sure, different campaigns have different flavors. However, I want to highlight some misconceptions that you seem to continue to bring up. </p><p></p><p>Just because you don't see a compelling reason to imagine a character with an oversized weapon doesn't mean other people don't. I could trivially find a half-dozen characters who are human and wielding massive weapons. And we don't have, naturally in the game, giant-sized weapons that are balanced for human characters to use. Additionally, someone might want to copy the aesthetic of a small-sized character known for wielding such weapons. </p><p></p><p>This is the point that I am digging into, because it seems like there is no consideration for it. Yes, a Halfling Barbarian is a bit of a silly concept from some angles. And yes, a halfling barbarian using a greatsword may look silly to you. However, for someone else it may harken to art or characters they appreciate. And dismissing it as nothing but number-crunching is ridiculous. If someone was purely number crunching, they wouldn't play a barbarian and especially not a barbarian halfling. </p><p></p><p>Sure, maybe they want to utilize PAM+GWM+Reckless Attack, but then they will want to go Variant human for the extra feat, or Half-Orc for more survivabilty and increased crit damage. The concept isn't optimal from the start, so dismissing the greatsword wielding halfling barbarian as nothing more than number crunching done for optimal combat efficiency deeply misses the point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9221309, member: 6801228"] Sure, different campaigns have different flavors. However, I want to highlight some misconceptions that you seem to continue to bring up. Just because you don't see a compelling reason to imagine a character with an oversized weapon doesn't mean other people don't. I could trivially find a half-dozen characters who are human and wielding massive weapons. And we don't have, naturally in the game, giant-sized weapons that are balanced for human characters to use. Additionally, someone might want to copy the aesthetic of a small-sized character known for wielding such weapons. This is the point that I am digging into, because it seems like there is no consideration for it. Yes, a Halfling Barbarian is a bit of a silly concept from some angles. And yes, a halfling barbarian using a greatsword may look silly to you. However, for someone else it may harken to art or characters they appreciate. And dismissing it as nothing but number-crunching is ridiculous. If someone was purely number crunching, they wouldn't play a barbarian and especially not a barbarian halfling. Sure, maybe they want to utilize PAM+GWM+Reckless Attack, but then they will want to go Variant human for the extra feat, or Half-Orc for more survivabilty and increased crit damage. The concept isn't optimal from the start, so dismissing the greatsword wielding halfling barbarian as nothing more than number crunching done for optimal combat efficiency deeply misses the point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Unearthed Arcana Playtest Includes Barbarian, Druid, and Monk
Top