Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Unearthed Arcana Playtest Includes Barbarian, Druid, and Monk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pauln6" data-source="post: 9240939" data-attributes="member: 6777422"><p>Such a dry exercise might merely be posturing for a sense of superiority, since the rules themselves only exist to serve the game of the players that are actually playing them. We can express our opinions on why we interpret them in a particular way but saying, "because that's how I interpret the RAW' shouldn't carry with it any kind of objective moral superiority. I like hearing people's reasons because it may turn out that I agree and might want to tweak my game, but there doesn't have to be a 'winner' in the debate.</p><p></p><p>I have never allowed multiclass fighters to cast two spells using action surge because IMO it was intended to make fighters awesome, not make wizards awesome. I have never allowed rogues to use cunning action to do 3 movement actions because IMO it was intended to make rogues tricksy, throwing things in their enemies' path when running away etc, not just running away really fast. I don't have to justify my reasons to anyone but some people might think, yeah, why didn't I think of that. Other people will just say, "You're doing it wrong. The RAW allow it". </p><p></p><p>Thanks, but I'm comfortable with my decisions! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> I am happy to listen though.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pauln6, post: 9240939, member: 6777422"] Such a dry exercise might merely be posturing for a sense of superiority, since the rules themselves only exist to serve the game of the players that are actually playing them. We can express our opinions on why we interpret them in a particular way but saying, "because that's how I interpret the RAW' shouldn't carry with it any kind of objective moral superiority. I like hearing people's reasons because it may turn out that I agree and might want to tweak my game, but there doesn't have to be a 'winner' in the debate. I have never allowed multiclass fighters to cast two spells using action surge because IMO it was intended to make fighters awesome, not make wizards awesome. I have never allowed rogues to use cunning action to do 3 movement actions because IMO it was intended to make rogues tricksy, throwing things in their enemies' path when running away etc, not just running away really fast. I don't have to justify my reasons to anyone but some people might think, yeah, why didn't I think of that. Other people will just say, "You're doing it wrong. The RAW allow it". Thanks, but I'm comfortable with my decisions! :) I am happy to listen though. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Unearthed Arcana Playtest Includes Barbarian, Druid, and Monk
Top