Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Unearthed Arcana Today: Giant Themed Class Options and Feats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blue" data-source="post: 8647440" data-attributes="member: 20564"><p>Perhaps you weren't as clear as you thought.</p><p></p><p></p><p>This particular part you were replying to the comment about the second feat being stronger and the first being weaker. So, since that is explicitly what <strong>you</strong> quoted and I responded to, that's what this part is talking about that. Please keep up with your own arguments - if they aren't strong enough to stick with you, they defitely aren't strong enough to stick with anyone else.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It's a public forum, others will see this as well. Ignorance that a design patterns was tried and considered a failure doesn't make it less true.</p><p></p><p></p><p>That's why I clarified. Since you have demonstrated that you aren't keeping up with your own points, this is about your "strong disagree" to my point about "Is it appropriately powerful but someone else is saying that I shouldn't have an appropriate feat because they don't think it's thematic? Bad design."</p><p></p><p></p><p>So, looking at what we were discussing, it looks like you are abandoning your "strongly disagree" to a more moderate position, and bringing in other aspects such as multiclassing that aren't represented in any of the feat chains in the UA Giants or UA Dragonlance so are pure conjecture.</p><p></p><p></p><p>So I am having a discussion with others about the UA, you step in and disagree with points I made explicitly about the UAs, and now you are trying to walk it back and say that you aren't talking about the UA? Even though that was the conversation you inserted yourself into? The context of it all? In a thread about the UA?</p><p></p><p><em>If you weren't talking about the UA, the good faith discussion could have been to start a new thread. Or at least not quote someone who was discussing the UA so it seems you were continuing that discussion.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blue, post: 8647440, member: 20564"] Perhaps you weren't as clear as you thought. This particular part you were replying to the comment about the second feat being stronger and the first being weaker. So, since that is explicitly what [B]you[/B] quoted and I responded to, that's what this part is talking about that. Please keep up with your own arguments - if they aren't strong enough to stick with you, they defitely aren't strong enough to stick with anyone else. It's a public forum, others will see this as well. Ignorance that a design patterns was tried and considered a failure doesn't make it less true. [B][/B] That's why I clarified. Since you have demonstrated that you aren't keeping up with your own points, this is about your "strong disagree" to my point about "Is it appropriately powerful but someone else is saying that I shouldn't have an appropriate feat because they don't think it's thematic? Bad design." So, looking at what we were discussing, it looks like you are abandoning your "strongly disagree" to a more moderate position, and bringing in other aspects such as multiclassing that aren't represented in any of the feat chains in the UA Giants or UA Dragonlance so are pure conjecture. So I am having a discussion with others about the UA, you step in and disagree with points I made explicitly about the UAs, and now you are trying to walk it back and say that you aren't talking about the UA? Even though that was the conversation you inserted yourself into? The context of it all? In a thread about the UA? [I]If you weren't talking about the UA, the good faith discussion could have been to start a new thread. Or at least not quote someone who was discussing the UA so it seems you were continuing that discussion.[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New Unearthed Arcana Today: Giant Themed Class Options and Feats
Top