Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
New web site design!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="12rounds" data-source="post: 2778811" data-attributes="member: 37795"><p>Some observations:</p><p></p><p>1) The site is not standards-compliant and does not validate as valid HTML. This means that the site doesn't necessarily look and behave the same in all browsers. You can see the validation results and generated errors here: </p><p><a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.toddschumacher.com%2F" target="_blank">http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.toddschumacher.com/</a></p><p></p><p>Why is it important to create valid HTML (and CSS for that matter)? </p><p>In the attached image "firefox-gallery.jpg" is what I see with Firefox.</p><p>In the attached image "opera-gallery.jpg" is what I see with Opera.</p><p>I have no Safari here, but by experience I'd say it resembles what I see with Opera (ie. probably not what is intended).</p><p></p><p>2) Many people (me included) don't use pure white as the color of their choise as active window background color. This means that the image-elements that are designed to show on white background look ugly if the page explicitly doesn't set the background color. This is illustrated in the attached "Image1.jpg" image. The fix is to include background color information in the body tag.</p><p></p><p>3) You have included no meta-information that would help indexing services (like Google) to assign your site keywords. This has no importance unless you desire your site more visibility in search engines.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Other than those ... looks good. </p><p>Keeping the structure simple, easy to navigate and without any annoying effects that draw attention away from the content (like blinking stuff, animated gifs etc) is the way to go in my opinion. Personally I like to avoid complex scripting myself (and boy the scripts do look a bit overwhelming for this kind of site!) unless there is absolutely no way to represent the information otherwise, but I guess that's a matter of taste (and also your site doesn't work in browsers that have disabled JavaScript execution - I don't see why your site NEEDS it because using Cascading Style Sheets would achieve pretty much the same net results anyway).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="12rounds, post: 2778811, member: 37795"] Some observations: 1) The site is not standards-compliant and does not validate as valid HTML. This means that the site doesn't necessarily look and behave the same in all browsers. You can see the validation results and generated errors here: [url]http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.toddschumacher.com%2F[/url] Why is it important to create valid HTML (and CSS for that matter)? In the attached image "firefox-gallery.jpg" is what I see with Firefox. In the attached image "opera-gallery.jpg" is what I see with Opera. I have no Safari here, but by experience I'd say it resembles what I see with Opera (ie. probably not what is intended). 2) Many people (me included) don't use pure white as the color of their choise as active window background color. This means that the image-elements that are designed to show on white background look ugly if the page explicitly doesn't set the background color. This is illustrated in the attached "Image1.jpg" image. The fix is to include background color information in the body tag. 3) You have included no meta-information that would help indexing services (like Google) to assign your site keywords. This has no importance unless you desire your site more visibility in search engines. Other than those ... looks good. Keeping the structure simple, easy to navigate and without any annoying effects that draw attention away from the content (like blinking stuff, animated gifs etc) is the way to go in my opinion. Personally I like to avoid complex scripting myself (and boy the scripts do look a bit overwhelming for this kind of site!) unless there is absolutely no way to represent the information otherwise, but I guess that's a matter of taste (and also your site doesn't work in browsers that have disabled JavaScript execution - I don't see why your site NEEDS it because using Cascading Style Sheets would achieve pretty much the same net results anyway). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
New web site design!
Top