Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New WotC Survey! Learn About A New D&D Product!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8305355" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>WotC don't own DNDBeyond.</p><p></p><p>They have relatively little control over it, because the contracts are already written, and they clearly don't include blocking secondary data usage, as Beyond20 and so on already do that as well.</p><p></p><p>So they couldn't do that.</p><p></p><p>As for sticking with their product, yeah, that is likely, but WotC are playing the long game here. They're not expecting everyone to instantly flip from DNDBeyond to their product. They'll likely offer incentives to us their product, whilst they build it up. It would not be hard to offer a superior product to DNDBeyond, frankly, much as I like it. Building a better core system and investing more in it's development (which would still be cheap) would let you exceed their capabilities in short order. On top of that, WotC stuff could be guaranteed to be fully functional day 1 of release, which isn't the case with DNDBeyond (for example, Supernatural Gifts from Theros and Dark Gifts from Ravenloft still don't work on Beyond).</p><p></p><p>And if they really are planning a new edition in the next few years, which I think they are, they could even playtest it via their new site - it would give them a level of direct feedback never seen before with playtesting. This would be both helpful for development purposes and in getting people moved to the site. Then when 6E or w/e comes out, you have people already using it, and whilst DNDBeyond etc. will be scrambling to accommodate all of 6E's features well, 6E will likely be designed specifically to work perfectly with WotC's own site. And as people are buying new books anyway, why not switch to WotC's official approach?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 8305355, member: 18"] WotC don't own DNDBeyond. They have relatively little control over it, because the contracts are already written, and they clearly don't include blocking secondary data usage, as Beyond20 and so on already do that as well. So they couldn't do that. As for sticking with their product, yeah, that is likely, but WotC are playing the long game here. They're not expecting everyone to instantly flip from DNDBeyond to their product. They'll likely offer incentives to us their product, whilst they build it up. It would not be hard to offer a superior product to DNDBeyond, frankly, much as I like it. Building a better core system and investing more in it's development (which would still be cheap) would let you exceed their capabilities in short order. On top of that, WotC stuff could be guaranteed to be fully functional day 1 of release, which isn't the case with DNDBeyond (for example, Supernatural Gifts from Theros and Dark Gifts from Ravenloft still don't work on Beyond). And if they really are planning a new edition in the next few years, which I think they are, they could even playtest it via their new site - it would give them a level of direct feedback never seen before with playtesting. This would be both helpful for development purposes and in getting people moved to the site. Then when 6E or w/e comes out, you have people already using it, and whilst DNDBeyond etc. will be scrambling to accommodate all of 6E's features well, 6E will likely be designed specifically to work perfectly with WotC's own site. And as people are buying new books anyway, why not switch to WotC's official approach? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
New WotC Survey! Learn About A New D&D Product!
Top