Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Shades of Eternity" data-source="post: 9743417" data-attributes="member: 10869">I received my new books and had a chance to look at them; honestly, after a 1st read, I seriously love them.It is very streamlined, and they fixed the ranger by splitting it into two classes: hunter and shepherd, both of which work significantly better than the grab bag of the 5e ranger.plus, they did what I have suggested for years:&nbsp; equipment slots, not weight encumbrance, so it is easy to keep track.Plus, they've addressed the size issues that make tiny/large pieces a problem.Reducing to 4 attributes and only using pluses makes tactical sense, as it cuts down on the &quot;not really sure which save it is supposed to be&quot; issue that 5e introduced.If I ever do a 3rd version of Hodgepocalypse, this will be the basis. Still, I will probably have to add things to fit my vision (because I want my three distinct things:&nbsp; monster PCs with related abilities, modern weapons, and vehicle rules).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Shades of Eternity, post: 9743417, member: 10869"] I received my new books and had a chance to look at them; honestly, after a 1st read, I seriously love them. It is very streamlined, and they fixed the ranger by splitting it into two classes: hunter and shepherd, both of which work significantly better than the grab bag of the 5e ranger. plus, they did what I have suggested for years: equipment slots, not weight encumbrance, so it is easy to keep track. Plus, they've addressed the size issues that make tiny/large pieces a problem. Reducing to 4 attributes and only using pluses makes tactical sense, as it cuts down on the "not really sure which save it is supposed to be" issue that 5e introduced. If I ever do a 3rd version of Hodgepocalypse, this will be the basis. Still, I will probably have to add things to fit my vision (because I want my three distinct things: monster PCs with related abilities, modern weapons, and vehicle rules). [/QUOTE]

Verification