Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Terath Ninir" data-source="post: 1028690" data-attributes="member: 47">Re: Re: Re: Re: NKL.SorcererThe more the merrier!I think yours was the only comment that said the class was *weak*.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />  I might try to throw in some more powers for them to lose at high levels if they go for a PrC.  Of course, the wizard could really use that, too.  That's why their PrC's are so hard to balance: when there's nothing but a familiar (and a couple of feats, for the wizard) to take away, you can't really give in a balanced way. Yes, well, I won't worry about poorly thought out prestige classes that I wouldn't allow in my campaign.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />  I swear, the only reason they have it is so that they can give Elminster even more power than he already has... Yes!  You've said much more simply what I've tried to get across.  Yes, this sorcerer can heal a lot, but the cleric still does a better job of it. I see where you're coming from, and I can see where it could be an issue in an over the top, max out everything munckin campaign.  In more reasonable campaigns, however, it will only add 6 or 8 spells to what the sorcerer knows over his career.  Not even as much as a clerical domain. I want to differintiate the sorcerer from the wizard as much as possible.  Yes, by the game mechanics of 3e, they are the same thing with different casting rules.  I would rather they not stay the same, though.As for the Epic rules -- I don't care if it's compatable.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />  I neither own nor wish to own those rules.  I'm not going to have a minor book that isn't OGC interfere with how I develop the alt.sorcerer class. Thank you!  We have very, very different takes on things, but it can only be a good thing to hear the counter arguments.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification