Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No Druid in PHB?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="azarias" data-source="post: 3784877" data-attributes="member: 54755"><p>Leaders: Cleric & Warlord</p><p>Defenders: Fighter & Paladin</p><p>Strikers: Ranger & Rogue</p><p>Controllers: Wizard & Warlock</p><p></p><p>**</p><p></p><p>Have these all been confirmed? I think it's been mentioned that there will be 8 classes, and I'm pretty sure the above have all been referenced repeatedly - so often that it would be curious if they were not all in the initial PHB offering.</p><p></p><p>So whither the Druid?</p><p></p><p>I must say I'd be a bit sad to see the Big D relegated. Druids, Psions and Wizards are my favourite classes to play. However, the 3.5 Druid design does bring together a lot of problematic game and play mechanics:</p><p></p><p>(1) Shapechange. Specifically, early-to-mid-game Wildshaping, which can be problematic for DMs. It introduces two potent abilities at relatively low levels:</p><p>[1a] Grappling, the rules for which are slow and cumbersome in 3.5, and</p><p>[1b] Flight, which negates a large array of threats to the Druid at the levels at which it becomes available. Especially when said Druid is built for...</p><p></p><p>(2) Summoning. The Complete Psionics nerf to Astral Construct flagged up an designer awareness of how multiple summons slow down the game. For almost any 3.5 Druid build, those multiple summons are bread and butter basics (even for riders or archers, I find). I remember very well how powerful 1d4+1 augmented Ashbound hippogriffs can be, and also how the fights bog down when they appear: which brings us to...</p><p></p><p>(3) Sidekicks. I always liked familiars, animal companions and psicrystals (never had a Paladin mount), but they too slow down fights: for a full caster, an animal companion also provides a fairly potent guardian whilst casting. Used as a meatshield, the Druid's familiar often allows him to operate at one remove from the fight at hand, which is cosy, but also perhaps less exciting - and again, we know excitement is one of the buzzwords of the new edition...</p><p></p><p>(4) Finally, there's the Druid's vaunted versatility. Many see this as the secret of the 3.5 Druid's power. Which of the four new roles would the 3.5 Druid tend towards? He could operate almost equally well in any of them, couldn't he? As a Controller, the 3.5 Druid has some of the best battlefield spells in the game - not to mention those pesky multiple summons. As a defender, the Druid can again flood the field with summons and companions, defending his companions by proxy as few others can even if he doesn't wade in himself. As a striker, he becomes a grappling dire what-have-you, and does pretty well. And as a Leader, he has social skills, a generally high Charisma (since he needs little Strength or Dexterity) and healing. From the new-role standpoint, he straddles too many bases.</p><p></p><p>It all makes a kind of sense to me, but even so...this is all redesignable. The Druid is a rich class concept. I'll be gutted to see him out of the top-tier mix.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="azarias, post: 3784877, member: 54755"] Leaders: Cleric & Warlord Defenders: Fighter & Paladin Strikers: Ranger & Rogue Controllers: Wizard & Warlock ** Have these all been confirmed? I think it's been mentioned that there will be 8 classes, and I'm pretty sure the above have all been referenced repeatedly - so often that it would be curious if they were not all in the initial PHB offering. So whither the Druid? I must say I'd be a bit sad to see the Big D relegated. Druids, Psions and Wizards are my favourite classes to play. However, the 3.5 Druid design does bring together a lot of problematic game and play mechanics: (1) Shapechange. Specifically, early-to-mid-game Wildshaping, which can be problematic for DMs. It introduces two potent abilities at relatively low levels: [1a] Grappling, the rules for which are slow and cumbersome in 3.5, and [1b] Flight, which negates a large array of threats to the Druid at the levels at which it becomes available. Especially when said Druid is built for... (2) Summoning. The Complete Psionics nerf to Astral Construct flagged up an designer awareness of how multiple summons slow down the game. For almost any 3.5 Druid build, those multiple summons are bread and butter basics (even for riders or archers, I find). I remember very well how powerful 1d4+1 augmented Ashbound hippogriffs can be, and also how the fights bog down when they appear: which brings us to... (3) Sidekicks. I always liked familiars, animal companions and psicrystals (never had a Paladin mount), but they too slow down fights: for a full caster, an animal companion also provides a fairly potent guardian whilst casting. Used as a meatshield, the Druid's familiar often allows him to operate at one remove from the fight at hand, which is cosy, but also perhaps less exciting - and again, we know excitement is one of the buzzwords of the new edition... (4) Finally, there's the Druid's vaunted versatility. Many see this as the secret of the 3.5 Druid's power. Which of the four new roles would the 3.5 Druid tend towards? He could operate almost equally well in any of them, couldn't he? As a Controller, the 3.5 Druid has some of the best battlefield spells in the game - not to mention those pesky multiple summons. As a defender, the Druid can again flood the field with summons and companions, defending his companions by proxy as few others can even if he doesn't wade in himself. As a striker, he becomes a grappling dire what-have-you, and does pretty well. And as a Leader, he has social skills, a generally high Charisma (since he needs little Strength or Dexterity) and healing. From the new-role standpoint, he straddles too many bases. It all makes a kind of sense to me, but even so...this is all redesignable. The Druid is a rich class concept. I'll be gutted to see him out of the top-tier mix. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No Druid in PHB?
Top