Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jack99" data-source="post: 4231192" data-attributes="member: 53135">In the past? You have a May 2008 join date. So unless you are an old member, who for some reason has changed account, I find your comment slightly odd. When that is said, I went through your old posts, and to be honest, you don't really come off as someone who is "on the fence". Sure, not all of your older posts are as negative as the ones in this thread, hell, some of them are even neutral or positive towards some aspect of 4e, but on the whole, you do come off as someone who has pretty negative feelings towards 4e. Fair enough though, to each his own.  I disagree. But if you feel that a lot of people are "after" you, maybe, just maybe you should consider that there might be a reason for it. Maybe it is the way you communicate or express yourself?I agree that 4e does have a tendency towards useless symmetry as well.  Players will still be able to be what you call Lawful Evil, this is a fact. If that is a fact, why do you care if it is called something else? Lets for a second say that in the PHB, under the description of evil, you will find what equals your current definition of Lawful Evil, along with your current definition of Neutral Evil - Why does it matter? You can still make the same characters, they can still behave the same way as before. They just have another alignment.. Seems to be you guys are making a whole lot of out nothing. Maybe you have a point, but we really won't know til June 6th.Cheers</blockquote>

Verification