Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dr. Strangemonkey" data-source="post: 4237601" data-attributes="member: 6533">No, I don't think this qualifies as a definitive answer since in this answer the Lawful-Netural-Chaotic qualifiers have nothing to do with the Good element.Is the Chaotic Good person going to violate the restriction on the grass regardless of who it hurts or how it hurts them?  How then is that person Good?If the Chaotic Good person is in fact going to consider the ramifications of stepping on the grass before making a judgement call on stepping on the grass how then does the Chaotic Good person differentiate from a Neutral Good person who's defining characteristic is that they would make that exact same judgement call?A Lawful Good perspective is easy to differentiate because they would consider the good purpose of staying off the grass and then work to develop systems for promoting that good.Since both Neutral good and Chaotic good work on an individualist basis there's really no difference between them unless you're simply going to specify that the Chaotic Good person is an anti-social jerk with a good heart which doesn't seem meaty enough to justify an alignment.</blockquote>