Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BSF" data-source="post: 3098479" data-attributes="member: 13098">Why would it?&nbsp; It is campaign specific after all.&nbsp; For example, my most recent homebrew didn't have any Orcs.&nbsp; At all.&nbsp; Which also eliminates all half-orcs.&nbsp; Two campaigns back, I didn't have Elves or Orcs.&nbsp; Absolutely no half-races were allowed either.&nbsp; &nbsp; That campaign also had the PCs dealing with no less than 4 liches.&nbsp; Zombies were much rarer than ghouls, ghasts, wights, wraiths, shadows, morhgs, death knights, flayed men, frost wraiths, flaming skeletons, and a plethora of other undead.I also make quite liberal use of chaos beasts and gibbering mouthers in some campaigns.&nbsp; The point is that my campaign's 'frequency' is going to be different from yours.&nbsp; I assure you that as surprised as the PCs might be at individual monsters, they all made sense to be encountered in the numbers that they were in the context of that campaign.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BSF, post: 3098479, member: 13098"] Why would it? It is campaign specific after all. For example, my most recent homebrew didn't have any Orcs. At all. Which also eliminates all half-orcs. Two campaigns back, I didn't have Elves or Orcs. Absolutely no half-races were allowed either. That campaign also had the PCs dealing with no less than 4 liches. Zombies were much rarer than ghouls, ghasts, wights, wraiths, shadows, morhgs, death knights, flayed men, frost wraiths, flaming skeletons, and a plethora of other undead. I also make quite liberal use of chaos beasts and gibbering mouthers in some campaigns. The point is that my campaign's 'frequency' is going to be different from yours. I assure you that as surprised as the PCs might be at individual monsters, they all made sense to be encountered in the numbers that they were in the context of that campaign. [/QUOTE]

Verification