Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"No magic items are necessary" vs Magic Items Awarded by Level
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bacon Bits" data-source="post: 9634294" data-attributes="member: 6777737"><p>"Magic items are not necessary," is kind of a confused idea in the community. Somehow it got interpreted my some people as "you should not give out magic items."</p><p></p><p>Magic items are necessary. They're one of the most important player rewards in the game. They're in-universe, tangible, often unique rewards that can include directly relevant narrative elements. They can be hooks. They can be MacGuffins. They can be campaign lynchpins. DMs are 100% expected to give out magic items in essentially every campaign. They are both too much fun and too much in line with the fiction of fantasy settings to not have magic items.</p><p></p><p>Magic items are only "not necessary" in the sense that there aren't really any creatures that say, "You must have +2 magic weapons or greater to be able to damage this creature." There aren't any creatures that say, "DR 50/+5". The designers didn't take the Proficiency Bonus off the class progression chart, split it in half, and then stick the other half of the bonus on attribute-enhancing magic items that you have to go out and find. Monsters don't have such overwhelming attack bonuses that, without magical armor bonuses, a character in full plate and shield would still be hit by 85% of attacks. Those are the designs from prior editions that made magic items <em>necessary </em>in those editions. The mechanics of the game in-and-of themselves demanded and required that players have magical gear in order to participate in the game at a very basic level.</p><p></p><p>Instead, in 5e when you're a level 20 Fighter and you pick up a +1 longsword, you are benefiting from a magic item reward. You are better than the design of the game assumes you are capable of achieving even by having the lowliest items in the game. That doesn't mean you should only give out +1 longsword. It means the reward you earned at level 5 is still able to benefit you in real mechanical ways at level 20. There is no mechanical expiration date on your magic item rewards. They helped you a lot when you go them, and they will be just as helpful for the rest of the game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bacon Bits, post: 9634294, member: 6777737"] "Magic items are not necessary," is kind of a confused idea in the community. Somehow it got interpreted my some people as "you should not give out magic items." Magic items are necessary. They're one of the most important player rewards in the game. They're in-universe, tangible, often unique rewards that can include directly relevant narrative elements. They can be hooks. They can be MacGuffins. They can be campaign lynchpins. DMs are 100% expected to give out magic items in essentially every campaign. They are both too much fun and too much in line with the fiction of fantasy settings to not have magic items. Magic items are only "not necessary" in the sense that there aren't really any creatures that say, "You must have +2 magic weapons or greater to be able to damage this creature." There aren't any creatures that say, "DR 50/+5". The designers didn't take the Proficiency Bonus off the class progression chart, split it in half, and then stick the other half of the bonus on attribute-enhancing magic items that you have to go out and find. Monsters don't have such overwhelming attack bonuses that, without magical armor bonuses, a character in full plate and shield would still be hit by 85% of attacks. Those are the designs from prior editions that made magic items [I]necessary [/I]in those editions. The mechanics of the game in-and-of themselves demanded and required that players have magical gear in order to participate in the game at a very basic level. Instead, in 5e when you're a level 20 Fighter and you pick up a +1 longsword, you are benefiting from a magic item reward. You are better than the design of the game assumes you are capable of achieving even by having the lowliest items in the game. That doesn't mean you should only give out +1 longsword. It means the reward you earned at level 5 is still able to benefit you in real mechanical ways at level 20. There is no mechanical expiration date on your magic item rewards. They helped you a lot when you go them, and they will be just as helpful for the rest of the game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"No magic items are necessary" vs Magic Items Awarded by Level
Top