Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 9517299" data-attributes="member: 7030563">If you are a full caster losing a caster level is a big hit.&nbsp; I don't see fighter being very attractive at all in the new rules when Paladin or Ranger are available and give you armor proficiency and weapon mastery without losing a caster level. I am also not seeing a lot of 1-level fighter dips on full caster, but I did not see them a lot on the old rules either.&nbsp; Any time someone dipped fighter in the old rules they usually went to 2 levels, but they were not nearly as common as Cleric for full casters that I saw.I am still seeing a ton opf multiclassing, more than before overall I think, but different combinations and far fewer 1 level Cleric and Sorc dips.Warlock now seems to be the most common multiclass overall (but with more than one level), lots of Paladins and Rangers of all level combos too.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 9517299, member: 7030563"] If you are a full caster losing a caster level is a big hit. I don't see fighter being very attractive at all in the new rules when Paladin or Ranger are available and give you armor proficiency and weapon mastery without losing a caster level. I am also not seeing a lot of 1-level fighter dips on full caster, but I did not see them a lot on the old rules either. Any time someone dipped fighter in the old rules they usually went to 2 levels, but they were not nearly as common as Cleric for full casters that I saw. I am still seeing a ton opf multiclassing, more than before overall I think, but different combinations and far fewer 1 level Cleric and Sorc dips. Warlock now seems to be the most common multiclass overall (but with more than one level), lots of Paladins and Rangers of all level combos too. [/QUOTE]

Verification