Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
No more "fluff"!!! [A rant and a request]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Treebore" data-source="post: 1405020" data-attributes="member: 10177"><p>The problem is Fluff has a legitimate usage, based on the interpretations of the reader. Even if the writer intended for their words to be "flavor", if the reader interprets it as useless drivel to pad the word count of the book, then it is "fluff" to that reader. So "fluff" still has a legitimate usage, just like "flavor" does. It just depends on how the individual interprets the material being discussed.</p><p></p><p>I agree that "flavor" should be the term used when you think the text was well worth reading.</p><p></p><p>I agree that "fluff" should be used when you think the text was made up just to increase the word count.</p><p></p><p>Both types of text do exist in RPG products. Sometimes the same text is described with both words, dependent upon the opinion of the person using the word.</p><p></p><p>As for Munchkin, I didn't know part of its definition meant you broke the rules or "went against the logic of the rule". Now I will have to be offended whenever anyone calls me a munchkin player.</p><p></p><p>Up to now I thought being a Munchkin was refusing to play a character that had lousy stats. A character that I wouldn't enjoy showing up to play. Who am I playing this game for? Me, the other players, or the DM? I always thought I was playing this game for me to have fun, not according to someone else's standards.</p><p></p><p>Granted, I also play so that others around me can also have their fun. That is also how I run my games when I DM.</p><p></p><p>I also run the game with the rules being intelligent guidelines that are generally good to use. They are not the definitive guide to running a good game. Having fun is. If I deem a rule interferes with fun, the rule goes.</p><p></p><p>But if being a Munchkin means I refuse to play a character with what I call bad stats, then I am proud to be a munchkin. I never break the rules or go against the "logic" of the rules. Assuming the rules are logical is a whole other issue. So if those are the true definition of a Munchkin, then I am deeply offended.</p><p></p><p>Gee, now I don't know what I am. I am not a powergamer, and now I am not a munchkin. So what am I? I guess I am just someone who plays and DM's the game their own way. I wonder if there is a word for that?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Treebore, post: 1405020, member: 10177"] The problem is Fluff has a legitimate usage, based on the interpretations of the reader. Even if the writer intended for their words to be "flavor", if the reader interprets it as useless drivel to pad the word count of the book, then it is "fluff" to that reader. So "fluff" still has a legitimate usage, just like "flavor" does. It just depends on how the individual interprets the material being discussed. I agree that "flavor" should be the term used when you think the text was well worth reading. I agree that "fluff" should be used when you think the text was made up just to increase the word count. Both types of text do exist in RPG products. Sometimes the same text is described with both words, dependent upon the opinion of the person using the word. As for Munchkin, I didn't know part of its definition meant you broke the rules or "went against the logic of the rule". Now I will have to be offended whenever anyone calls me a munchkin player. Up to now I thought being a Munchkin was refusing to play a character that had lousy stats. A character that I wouldn't enjoy showing up to play. Who am I playing this game for? Me, the other players, or the DM? I always thought I was playing this game for me to have fun, not according to someone else's standards. Granted, I also play so that others around me can also have their fun. That is also how I run my games when I DM. I also run the game with the rules being intelligent guidelines that are generally good to use. They are not the definitive guide to running a good game. Having fun is. If I deem a rule interferes with fun, the rule goes. But if being a Munchkin means I refuse to play a character with what I call bad stats, then I am proud to be a munchkin. I never break the rules or go against the "logic" of the rules. Assuming the rules are logical is a whole other issue. So if those are the true definition of a Munchkin, then I am deeply offended. Gee, now I don't know what I am. I am not a powergamer, and now I am not a munchkin. So what am I? I guess I am just someone who plays and DM's the game their own way. I wonder if there is a word for that? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
No more "fluff"!!! [A rant and a request]
Top