Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
No more "fluff"!!! [A rant and a request]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FireLance" data-source="post: 1405920" data-attributes="member: 3424"><p>[Aside]How would you like your omelette - fluffy or crunchy?[/Aside] <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> </p><p></p><p>I prefer to use the terms "flavor" and "mechanics" myself, but I have no problem with either "fluff" or "crunch".</p><p></p><p>Fundamentally, though, I see no conflict between the two. In fact, flavor and mechanics must often go hand in hand. Consider the most basic of mechanics, the attack roll: roll d20 and add your BAB, your Strength modifier and your other modifiers. Any flavor here? Well, what about the following:</p><p></p><p>1. In this setting, there is an element of chance (the d20 roll). Characters do not always automatically succeed or fail.</p><p></p><p>2. In this setting, characters do not have an equal chance of succeeding at all tasks. Some succeed more often because they have more skill than others (BAB).</p><p></p><p>3. In this setting, strong characters have a better chance to hit others in combat.</p><p></p><p>4. In this setting, there are other ways to improve your ability to hit in combat apart from skill and strength (size, equipment, circumstances, etc).</p><p></p><p>All these may be obvious, intuitive and flavor-wise, quite bland, but a bland flavor is different from the absence of flavor.</p><p></p><p>Now, consider the following bit of flavor: Legolas is able to fire arrows at his opponents while descending a flight of stairs on a shield. Without the mechanics to back up this bit of flavor, DMs are basically left to decide what it means and what happens when a PC tries to replicate the same stunt. Does Legolas simply have an extremely hight Balance modifier? Does he have the Shield Surfing feat? Does he have a level in the Shield Surfer prestige class? Is he able to do it because he is an elf, and a non-elven PC who tries it will not be able to succeed? Flavor without mechanics leads to inconsistent application. Even so, this is less of a problem as long as every DM is internally consistent and everyone remembers rule 0.</p><p></p><p>Fundamentally, different people will have different needs with respect to flavor and mechanics. Some aren't comfortable tinkering with mechanics and will want more rules. Others are looking for inspiration and want more flavor. And some want a little of both.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FireLance, post: 1405920, member: 3424"] [Aside]How would you like your omelette - fluffy or crunchy?[/Aside] :p I prefer to use the terms "flavor" and "mechanics" myself, but I have no problem with either "fluff" or "crunch". Fundamentally, though, I see no conflict between the two. In fact, flavor and mechanics must often go hand in hand. Consider the most basic of mechanics, the attack roll: roll d20 and add your BAB, your Strength modifier and your other modifiers. Any flavor here? Well, what about the following: 1. In this setting, there is an element of chance (the d20 roll). Characters do not always automatically succeed or fail. 2. In this setting, characters do not have an equal chance of succeeding at all tasks. Some succeed more often because they have more skill than others (BAB). 3. In this setting, strong characters have a better chance to hit others in combat. 4. In this setting, there are other ways to improve your ability to hit in combat apart from skill and strength (size, equipment, circumstances, etc). All these may be obvious, intuitive and flavor-wise, quite bland, but a bland flavor is different from the absence of flavor. Now, consider the following bit of flavor: Legolas is able to fire arrows at his opponents while descending a flight of stairs on a shield. Without the mechanics to back up this bit of flavor, DMs are basically left to decide what it means and what happens when a PC tries to replicate the same stunt. Does Legolas simply have an extremely hight Balance modifier? Does he have the Shield Surfing feat? Does he have a level in the Shield Surfer prestige class? Is he able to do it because he is an elf, and a non-elven PC who tries it will not be able to succeed? Flavor without mechanics leads to inconsistent application. Even so, this is less of a problem as long as every DM is internally consistent and everyone remembers rule 0. Fundamentally, different people will have different needs with respect to flavor and mechanics. Some aren't comfortable tinkering with mechanics and will want more rules. Others are looking for inspiration and want more flavor. And some want a little of both. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
No more "fluff"!!! [A rant and a request]
Top