Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Col" data-source="post: 1406456" data-attributes="member: 17161">EDIT: Fixed a bit of the novel praise section, because I'd worded it, well, poorly (no snooty atitude intended in the original post!) Hi all.I think we need to claim the word fluff, and make it our own. Sure, it may take a few decades, but eventually people would associate the word fluff (at least when used in a roleplaying context-- and there's always context &lt;not always intended context, but if you're using the word fluff with a description of a roleplaying product (scary thought, roleplaying hair gel <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />, or in a conversation involving other terms that can be grouped in a 'roleplaying' context, most people will read it in that context&gt;) with setting, as opposed to seeing it in a negative light.Or we could just use flavour.But I dig the chance to subvert a word <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />A weird first post, but neh...Oh, by the by, if Mouseferatu's still reading this thread, way to rock on &quot;Gehenna: The Final Night&quot; novel. Not how I'm use to running Vampire (these days), but something a way of playing I'd definately like to try out. And it tied a big history up with a sense of expert fun, had a more kicking tempo then &quot;The Last Battle&quot; (in the context of how I understood the novels) and I dug the characters. WW would be the loser if you're not writing any more fiction in the new WoD.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Col, post: 1406456, member: 17161"] [I]EDIT: Fixed a bit of the novel praise section, because I'd worded it, well, poorly (no snooty atitude intended in the original post!)[/I] Hi all. I think we need to claim the word fluff, and make it our own. Sure, it may take a few decades, but eventually people would associate the word fluff (at least when used in a roleplaying context-- and there's always context <not always intended context, but if you're using the word fluff with a description of a roleplaying product (scary thought, roleplaying hair gel :-), or in a conversation involving other terms that can be grouped in a 'roleplaying' context, most people will read it in that context>) with setting, as opposed to seeing it in a negative light. Or we could just use flavour. But I dig the chance to subvert a word :-) A weird first post, but neh... Oh, by the by, if Mouseferatu's still reading this thread, way to rock on "Gehenna: The Final Night" novel. Not how I'm use to running Vampire (these days), but something a way of playing I'd definately like to try out. And it tied a big history up with a sense of expert fun, had a more kicking tempo then "The Last Battle" (in the context of how I understood the novels) and I dug the characters. WW would be the loser if you're not writing any more fiction in the new WoD. [/QUOTE]

Verification