Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Thomas Shey" data-source="post: 9348520" data-attributes="member: 7026617">But that's where you lose me.  I don't think its bad design.  Its just design that hasn't bothered to serve needs it doesn't expect its users to have.Most mundane RuneQuest animals are a set of stats and skills and nothing more.  Sometimes they may have a special attack form outside that.  But that's about where it ends, and I rarely saw anyone bothered by that.  That wasn't just something they could live with; it was something where anything beyond it would have been pointless.I think this still means you're assuming a set of needs that just isn't there a lot of time.  Frankly, it kind of strikes me as a little D&D-centric as phrased, far as that goes.</blockquote>