Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
No More Multi-Classing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kishin" data-source="post: 3042779" data-attributes="member: 40956"><p>Because there are obstacles in the way of their meteoric rise to power? Things out there killing off those elves pre, post or during their climb to Epic Level? </p><p></p><p>More importantly though, like humans, not every demi-human possesses the ambition or the acumen to reach those levels of power. Some probably could care less.</p><p></p><p>These to me the bigger arguments, but there are of course, other elements of support. If you use the 'vanilla' D&D Elf fluff, for example, they're capricious and not prone to devoting themselves wholly to a singular pursuit. The average elf is a dabbler in vanilla terms.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Ultimately, I fail to see how making demihuman races patently inferior breaks suspension of disbelief. Also, there are far better candidates for world domination than the long lived races. Dragons accrue power simply by existing and aging, theoretically, this is at little risk to themselves (save for of course, the occasional nosy adventurer), why don't THEY rule the world? Beings that are capable of reducing entire kingdoms to rubble are a bit more qualified for the job, if you ask me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Can you conjure up a terribly compelling argument as to why Dwarf Wizards shouldn't be allowed? </p><p></p><p>Archetypes are one thing, but the idea that all the adventuring members of one species are functionally the same in terms of skills and abilities is ludicrous overgeneralization, especially since adventurers are some of the most individualistic entities there are. Its tantamount to presenting all Historians as being versed in South American history. Adventuring's a pretty broad field, not all members of a race are going to pursue the same avenues of it. Sure, they might be naturally predisposed towards some elements, but that should not make for the exclusion of others.</p><p></p><p>I'll admit a slight bias here. I absolutely cannot stand seeing fantasy, a genre that supposedly allows for nigh infinite creativity, to be constrained by a set of arbitrary tropes based off tradition or someone else's perceptions. Options are never a bad thing, and I'd rather be able to paint with a palette of thirty colors rather than three, as there's a greater chance I'll be able to express what I really want to express.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Being a fellow denizen of that selfsame not-so-hallowed state, I can attest to the validity of this statement. But hey, thanks to you and I, we can now say that approximately 28% of the gaming population of Connecticut is present on ENWorld.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kishin, post: 3042779, member: 40956"] Because there are obstacles in the way of their meteoric rise to power? Things out there killing off those elves pre, post or during their climb to Epic Level? More importantly though, like humans, not every demi-human possesses the ambition or the acumen to reach those levels of power. Some probably could care less. These to me the bigger arguments, but there are of course, other elements of support. If you use the 'vanilla' D&D Elf fluff, for example, they're capricious and not prone to devoting themselves wholly to a singular pursuit. The average elf is a dabbler in vanilla terms. Ultimately, I fail to see how making demihuman races patently inferior breaks suspension of disbelief. Also, there are far better candidates for world domination than the long lived races. Dragons accrue power simply by existing and aging, theoretically, this is at little risk to themselves (save for of course, the occasional nosy adventurer), why don't THEY rule the world? Beings that are capable of reducing entire kingdoms to rubble are a bit more qualified for the job, if you ask me. Can you conjure up a terribly compelling argument as to why Dwarf Wizards shouldn't be allowed? Archetypes are one thing, but the idea that all the adventuring members of one species are functionally the same in terms of skills and abilities is ludicrous overgeneralization, especially since adventurers are some of the most individualistic entities there are. Its tantamount to presenting all Historians as being versed in South American history. Adventuring's a pretty broad field, not all members of a race are going to pursue the same avenues of it. Sure, they might be naturally predisposed towards some elements, but that should not make for the exclusion of others. I'll admit a slight bias here. I absolutely cannot stand seeing fantasy, a genre that supposedly allows for nigh infinite creativity, to be constrained by a set of arbitrary tropes based off tradition or someone else's perceptions. Options are never a bad thing, and I'd rather be able to paint with a palette of thirty colors rather than three, as there's a greater chance I'll be able to express what I really want to express. Being a fellow denizen of that selfsame not-so-hallowed state, I can attest to the validity of this statement. But hey, thanks to you and I, we can now say that approximately 28% of the gaming population of Connecticut is present on ENWorld. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
No More Multi-Classing
Top