Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No More Reptiles with Boobs!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sylrae" data-source="post: 5778022" data-attributes="member: 48520"><p>Well, I strongly disagreed with the assertion that I just wanted everyone to look like men, when that had nothing to do with it. So I had to set that straight.</p><p></p><p>As for the bestial races that just look like human women in latex suits, if there's such a demand for them, I can't really say that they shouldnt put them in the game. If other people want them in their games, good for them, I suppose. But not everyone wants them, so I will hope they at least don't retcon them over existing material.</p><p></p><p>I can always say: "No Dragonborn". Just like I can say no to Warforged and Shifters (not a big eberron fan), when I'm running the game. I can opt out of a game with players who are using them, like I opt out of Pathfinder games with a gunslinger characters, or 3.5 games with ToB classes. If I really dislike an option, I can just not play with it. This is particularly viable because often I get stuck running the game; so I have direct access to controlling which options are/are not allowed.</p><p></p><p>If I ever see big breasted kobold women though, thats the sort of thing that might stop me from buying the book. Because it would be going from adding something new that I dont like (which I can ignore/not use), to replacing something old that I did like with something new that I hate. And that means that the thing I did like will be supported in this in future products as something else that I wont ever want to use again. That that, would be rather frustrating.</p><p></p><p>Art direction matters. Otherwise they wouldnt put images in the books.</p><p></p><p>[Edit]And to be clear, I've never been a big fan of the dragonborn anyways, and I'm fine with not including them, but this "Give it Boobs!" habit has always bugged me. Admittedly I didnt think there would be any female players who considered it so important to keep them.</p><p></p><p>I dont think a male dragonborn, for example, needs to have a similar build to a burly orc, I'd actually have preferred something more like the poisondusk lizardfolk or an actual dragon.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sylrae, post: 5778022, member: 48520"] Well, I strongly disagreed with the assertion that I just wanted everyone to look like men, when that had nothing to do with it. So I had to set that straight. As for the bestial races that just look like human women in latex suits, if there's such a demand for them, I can't really say that they shouldnt put them in the game. If other people want them in their games, good for them, I suppose. But not everyone wants them, so I will hope they at least don't retcon them over existing material. I can always say: "No Dragonborn". Just like I can say no to Warforged and Shifters (not a big eberron fan), when I'm running the game. I can opt out of a game with players who are using them, like I opt out of Pathfinder games with a gunslinger characters, or 3.5 games with ToB classes. If I really dislike an option, I can just not play with it. This is particularly viable because often I get stuck running the game; so I have direct access to controlling which options are/are not allowed. If I ever see big breasted kobold women though, thats the sort of thing that might stop me from buying the book. Because it would be going from adding something new that I dont like (which I can ignore/not use), to replacing something old that I did like with something new that I hate. And that means that the thing I did like will be supported in this in future products as something else that I wont ever want to use again. That that, would be rather frustrating. Art direction matters. Otherwise they wouldnt put images in the books. [Edit]And to be clear, I've never been a big fan of the dragonborn anyways, and I'm fine with not including them, but this "Give it Boobs!" habit has always bugged me. Admittedly I didnt think there would be any female players who considered it so important to keep them. I dont think a male dragonborn, for example, needs to have a similar build to a burly orc, I'd actually have preferred something more like the poisondusk lizardfolk or an actual dragon. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No More Reptiles with Boobs!
Top