Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
No One Plays High Level?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MNblockhead" data-source="post: 9194024" data-attributes="member: 6796661"><p>Thanks, I'm both excited for the finale and am also looking forward to starting a new campaign. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Don't fall into the more HP trap. Maybe it'll keep some enemies in combat for a round or two extra, but at this level, PCs can deal extreme damage and more HP doesn't do much to make combat more interesting. </p><p></p><p>For example, say you are fighting Orcus and he uses his wand to summon 500 HP of undead. Rather than one or two undead dragons, it will be much more scary and fun combat to bring in a lot of glass canon undead with a variety of special attacks. Think alips, ghosts, haints, poltergeists, maybe throw in both a demilich and some flame skulls. Which floating head is the demilich? In this example, I actually LOWER the HP of the individual minions so I can bring more of them in. The action economy starts to make things scary, I only allow one arcana check per turn so they are going to have to start combat without knowing what everything is (I don't tell them what the things are, only that they see various spirits and floating skulls). It forces meaningful strategic choices, especially with things that have high mobility, can go ethereal, are incorporeal, melt/hide in shadows, etc. </p><p></p><p>While I will still use things like banishment, paralysis, etc., I much prefer charm magic, possession, etc. Where the player can still play, against the other players. Having multiple enemies in the battle that can do these things are still scary, even at high levels. A score of ghosts can be more scary than a lich. </p><p></p><p>You pretty much have to go with high-level magic enemies, traps, and puzzles at this level. Lots of ways to prevent planar travel, teleportation, etc. Also, I don't have a problem with lair effects and protections that a PC couldn't do using RAW. It is fair because PCs (at least in my group) have lots of divination and other resources to learn about what they may be getting into. My players are the type that will spend a crazy amount of time on magical and mundane intel gathering and have a great many resources with which to accomplish this, so I don't feel that I have to pull any punches here. Other groups of players not used to my DMing style, or who find prep boring, might have problems with this. </p><p></p><p>I probably spend more time than necessary thinking about the cosmological order in my campaign. Not only because I enjoy it and because it helps with adjudicating the wish spell. I'm not great at improvising the wish spell on the spot, so it helps to have some heuristics or a sense of how it would work or not work in my world. This allows me to fairly adjudicate wishes without being arbitrary and puts the power into the players hands to research and divinate on how certain wishes could play out. I keep what they learn somewhat vague so there is still room for surprises, but I've been able to avoid players feeling like they've wasted a wish. </p><p></p><p>In my current campaign, which is focused on a specific area and is not a planes jumping, universe spanning campaign, it helps to have something that grounds the party to the area and makes them care. I use a homebrew system that mixes rules from Strongholds and Followers, rules for reputations from an old EN5ider article, and a mix of PHP, DMG, and Xanathar's downtime activity. The cleric has started a new religious order, the party has built up their various strongholds into a growing town, and there are various factional politics that can help and hinder the party in meeting their goals. </p><p></p><p>Also, in this campaign, I take a somewhat adversarial role. Not really in that I want to win, but my bad guys do and I will try to kill the PCs. In low levels, that played out mostly through a sandboxy and deadly environment where incaution could easily lead to death. At high levels, however, it means the bad guys see the PCs as an existential threat and will do anything within their power to take them out. Since they are grounded to the area, have a lot of people and goals they want to protect, and are actually NOT gods and can't be everywhere at once, it makes factional politics much more important and strategically building up troops, followers, and other protections to safeguard their interests and the people they care about. </p><p></p><p>They have always had the option to just move on to some other area and take the campaign in whatever direction they wanted (I have a crazy amount of Lost Lands material) but they've come to care enough about cleansing Rappan Athuk, bringing civilization to the Forest of Hope, and supporting their allies that they never did. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, and it often isn't that fun. Often it is getting to the BBEG that is more of a challenge and more fun than the actual final encounter. In a long campaign, not every encounter with a big bad has to be epic. It is cathartic to wipe the floor with bad guys after you finally find and get to them. I've learned to focus on a few set piece, epic battles, and am less worried about every combat being a challenge. It is important to make the exploration and social pillars of play still matter at high levels. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, I think that is what is needed. A high level adventure should include a lot of advice for GMs on how to adjust the adventure for different play styles and powers. It would make it more wordy, but it would help more DMs get over their anxiety of running high level adventures.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MNblockhead, post: 9194024, member: 6796661"] Thanks, I'm both excited for the finale and am also looking forward to starting a new campaign. Don't fall into the more HP trap. Maybe it'll keep some enemies in combat for a round or two extra, but at this level, PCs can deal extreme damage and more HP doesn't do much to make combat more interesting. For example, say you are fighting Orcus and he uses his wand to summon 500 HP of undead. Rather than one or two undead dragons, it will be much more scary and fun combat to bring in a lot of glass canon undead with a variety of special attacks. Think alips, ghosts, haints, poltergeists, maybe throw in both a demilich and some flame skulls. Which floating head is the demilich? In this example, I actually LOWER the HP of the individual minions so I can bring more of them in. The action economy starts to make things scary, I only allow one arcana check per turn so they are going to have to start combat without knowing what everything is (I don't tell them what the things are, only that they see various spirits and floating skulls). It forces meaningful strategic choices, especially with things that have high mobility, can go ethereal, are incorporeal, melt/hide in shadows, etc. While I will still use things like banishment, paralysis, etc., I much prefer charm magic, possession, etc. Where the player can still play, against the other players. Having multiple enemies in the battle that can do these things are still scary, even at high levels. A score of ghosts can be more scary than a lich. You pretty much have to go with high-level magic enemies, traps, and puzzles at this level. Lots of ways to prevent planar travel, teleportation, etc. Also, I don't have a problem with lair effects and protections that a PC couldn't do using RAW. It is fair because PCs (at least in my group) have lots of divination and other resources to learn about what they may be getting into. My players are the type that will spend a crazy amount of time on magical and mundane intel gathering and have a great many resources with which to accomplish this, so I don't feel that I have to pull any punches here. Other groups of players not used to my DMing style, or who find prep boring, might have problems with this. I probably spend more time than necessary thinking about the cosmological order in my campaign. Not only because I enjoy it and because it helps with adjudicating the wish spell. I'm not great at improvising the wish spell on the spot, so it helps to have some heuristics or a sense of how it would work or not work in my world. This allows me to fairly adjudicate wishes without being arbitrary and puts the power into the players hands to research and divinate on how certain wishes could play out. I keep what they learn somewhat vague so there is still room for surprises, but I've been able to avoid players feeling like they've wasted a wish. In my current campaign, which is focused on a specific area and is not a planes jumping, universe spanning campaign, it helps to have something that grounds the party to the area and makes them care. I use a homebrew system that mixes rules from Strongholds and Followers, rules for reputations from an old EN5ider article, and a mix of PHP, DMG, and Xanathar's downtime activity. The cleric has started a new religious order, the party has built up their various strongholds into a growing town, and there are various factional politics that can help and hinder the party in meeting their goals. Also, in this campaign, I take a somewhat adversarial role. Not really in that I want to win, but my bad guys do and I will try to kill the PCs. In low levels, that played out mostly through a sandboxy and deadly environment where incaution could easily lead to death. At high levels, however, it means the bad guys see the PCs as an existential threat and will do anything within their power to take them out. Since they are grounded to the area, have a lot of people and goals they want to protect, and are actually NOT gods and can't be everywhere at once, it makes factional politics much more important and strategically building up troops, followers, and other protections to safeguard their interests and the people they care about. They have always had the option to just move on to some other area and take the campaign in whatever direction they wanted (I have a crazy amount of Lost Lands material) but they've come to care enough about cleansing Rappan Athuk, bringing civilization to the Forest of Hope, and supporting their allies that they never did. Yeah, and it often isn't that fun. Often it is getting to the BBEG that is more of a challenge and more fun than the actual final encounter. In a long campaign, not every encounter with a big bad has to be epic. It is cathartic to wipe the floor with bad guys after you finally find and get to them. I've learned to focus on a few set piece, epic battles, and am less worried about every combat being a challenge. It is important to make the exploration and social pillars of play still matter at high levels. Yeah, I think that is what is needed. A high level adventure should include a lot of advice for GMs on how to adjust the adventure for different play styles and powers. It would make it more wordy, but it would help more DMs get over their anxiety of running high level adventures. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
No One Plays High Level?
Top