Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
No One Reads Conan Now -- So What Are They Reading?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guest&nbsp; 85555" data-source="post: 9603982"><p>I would push back on this. Obviously it is a matter of taste, but Howard is one of those writers that I find holds up on repeat readings years later. I also think he is much easier for a modern reader to absorb than many of the other writers from that era (simply on the prose front). Yes, these are cliches now, and I am not terribly interested in whether he invented them or was imitating someone else. But if one did invent a cliche, I don't think one can really critique the work for being so (just to mention Frankenstein again this would be like complaining that Frankenstein has the 'tired trop of the mad scientist'. I also would say there isn't anything necessarily wrong with cliches and tropes. Genres are often built on them, and you can have a novel full of cliches that is thrilling at every turn because the writer has a good command of their craft. Sometimes going after tropes and trying to do a fresh take becomes dull too (I found His Dark Materials very boring because it just seemed to be a diatribe against Narnia: and I am not even a big Narnia fan as I found those books a little on the dull side as well). I did like Pullman's descriptions but that was about all I really appreciated reading him. I think both these approaches (being new and original, embracing cliches), can be equally entertaining. It really comes down to how good the writing itself is, how interested the writer can make me in their characters, and how much I gel with the writer's personality on the page </p><p></p><p>But when it comes to Howard I really like his writing style. It always keeps me engaged. And anytime I read one of his stories, I come away feeling very inspired to create something myself (whereas when I read Sanderson, this isn't my response: and that isn't a criticism of Sanderson, it is just my reaction). I have a number of Conan Volumes and I have to say, they are some of the stories I pull off the shelf more than any other because they are reliably good. If they don't do anything for people fair. But I do think the Conan stories have a lot of value for fantasy fans</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guest 85555, post: 9603982"] I would push back on this. Obviously it is a matter of taste, but Howard is one of those writers that I find holds up on repeat readings years later. I also think he is much easier for a modern reader to absorb than many of the other writers from that era (simply on the prose front). Yes, these are cliches now, and I am not terribly interested in whether he invented them or was imitating someone else. But if one did invent a cliche, I don't think one can really critique the work for being so (just to mention Frankenstein again this would be like complaining that Frankenstein has the 'tired trop of the mad scientist'. I also would say there isn't anything necessarily wrong with cliches and tropes. Genres are often built on them, and you can have a novel full of cliches that is thrilling at every turn because the writer has a good command of their craft. Sometimes going after tropes and trying to do a fresh take becomes dull too (I found His Dark Materials very boring because it just seemed to be a diatribe against Narnia: and I am not even a big Narnia fan as I found those books a little on the dull side as well). I did like Pullman's descriptions but that was about all I really appreciated reading him. I think both these approaches (being new and original, embracing cliches), can be equally entertaining. It really comes down to how good the writing itself is, how interested the writer can make me in their characters, and how much I gel with the writer's personality on the page But when it comes to Howard I really like his writing style. It always keeps me engaged. And anytime I read one of his stories, I come away feeling very inspired to create something myself (whereas when I read Sanderson, this isn't my response: and that isn't a criticism of Sanderson, it is just my reaction). I have a number of Conan Volumes and I have to say, they are some of the stories I pull off the shelf more than any other because they are reliably good. If they don't do anything for people fair. But I do think the Conan stories have a lot of value for fantasy fans [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
No One Reads Conan Now -- So What Are They Reading?
Top