Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
No Spell-less Ranger in the Near Future
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 7216637" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>Ah yes... the self-nerf! The very thing many posters here complain about doing in the name of characterization! Woe be to them that wish oh so desperately to play a character with a theme, but those rat bastards Wizards of the Coast refuse to let them do that by keeping in rules for "better" abilities that they are incapable of just not selecting. Poor, poor players!</p><p></p><p>"I want to play a Storm Sorcerer focused on thunder and lightning! But <em>Fireball</em> is the best spell there is at 3rd level so I can't NOT take it! If only WotC would publish an official "thematic" spell list for each type of sorcerer so that I am FORCED to not take Fireball! But they're jerks and won't do that!"</p><p></p><p>"I want to be a blade Warlock who is focused on my weapon! But Eldritch Blast is just too good of a cantrip! And the Agonizing Blast invocation just makes Eldritch Blast even better, so I HAVE to select them both! But now I'm a ranged PC and not a melee one and I can't take another invocation more to my theme! All because WotC put those items in the Player's Handbook and have not designed a new subclass that penalizes me from selecting them! If only they'd do that, then they'd no longer be the best option for my blade Warlock, and I wouldn't be forced to take them anymore! Man, those WotC guys are jerks!"</p><p></p><p>"How in the world can I select a FUN feat for my PC when WotC has created nothing but a "feat-fax" by adding these stupid 'Weapon Expertise' feats into the game? Now I have no choice but to use one of my 4E feat slots to take--</p><p></p><p>Oh wait. Hang on. Heh. Sorry... I was having flashbacks there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 7216637, member: 7006"] Ah yes... the self-nerf! The very thing many posters here complain about doing in the name of characterization! Woe be to them that wish oh so desperately to play a character with a theme, but those rat bastards Wizards of the Coast refuse to let them do that by keeping in rules for "better" abilities that they are incapable of just not selecting. Poor, poor players! "I want to play a Storm Sorcerer focused on thunder and lightning! But [I]Fireball[/I] is the best spell there is at 3rd level so I can't NOT take it! If only WotC would publish an official "thematic" spell list for each type of sorcerer so that I am FORCED to not take Fireball! But they're jerks and won't do that!" "I want to be a blade Warlock who is focused on my weapon! But Eldritch Blast is just too good of a cantrip! And the Agonizing Blast invocation just makes Eldritch Blast even better, so I HAVE to select them both! But now I'm a ranged PC and not a melee one and I can't take another invocation more to my theme! All because WotC put those items in the Player's Handbook and have not designed a new subclass that penalizes me from selecting them! If only they'd do that, then they'd no longer be the best option for my blade Warlock, and I wouldn't be forced to take them anymore! Man, those WotC guys are jerks!" "How in the world can I select a FUN feat for my PC when WotC has created nothing but a "feat-fax" by adding these stupid 'Weapon Expertise' feats into the game? Now I have no choice but to use one of my 4E feat slots to take-- Oh wait. Hang on. Heh. Sorry... I was having flashbacks there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
No Spell-less Ranger in the Near Future
Top