Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No spell resistance vs. Orb spells? Why?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="charlesatan" data-source="post: 3449668" data-attributes="member: 20870"><p>If the auto-kill argument is something we can drop, then I'm glad. It's one less thing to debate about. Which was my point with my previous posts.</p><p></p><p>Second, I don't want to get into an argument which is overall better: a ranged touch attack or a saving throw against a spell. The former is an all-or-nothing gambit: if it hits, you're dealt full damage. If it doesn't, nothing. A saving throw on the other hand is the reverse: at worse, it's half damage. At best, it's full damage. But never under any circumstances is a ranged touch attack an auto-hit. At best there's a 5% chance for failure. But I don't think that will always be the case (certainly there will be chances when that will be the case but there will also be scenarios when you will only have 5% chance to hit). For me the ranged touch attack vs saving throw is a stylistic choice. Depending on the opponent the former might be a better choice than the latter but it is far from "all the time the former trumps the latter".</p><p></p><p>Third, they're both energy based. Okay. For me Abjuration, Conjuration, and Evocation had energy subtypes. Evocation just tends to have more of them.</p><p></p><p>Fourth, I'm not denying that the Orb spells aren't great single target spells. They are. But so what? I don't think single target spells are the forte of Evocation. It's spells that damage multiple targets. And the Orbs don't occupy that particular niche. It's giving the chance to do 10d6 damage at multiple targets for 15d6 at just one.</p><p></p><p>Fifth, what I think is the heart of the argument is that the Orb spells ignores SR. Evocation spells simply don't have such a counterpart. That I think is what we should be discussing. Not the other "red herrings". And even assuming the Orbs are imbalanced, it's not dethroning the school of Evocation. I still can't hit multiple targets with the Orb spells at the same damage output. Evocation can.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="charlesatan, post: 3449668, member: 20870"] If the auto-kill argument is something we can drop, then I'm glad. It's one less thing to debate about. Which was my point with my previous posts. Second, I don't want to get into an argument which is overall better: a ranged touch attack or a saving throw against a spell. The former is an all-or-nothing gambit: if it hits, you're dealt full damage. If it doesn't, nothing. A saving throw on the other hand is the reverse: at worse, it's half damage. At best, it's full damage. But never under any circumstances is a ranged touch attack an auto-hit. At best there's a 5% chance for failure. But I don't think that will always be the case (certainly there will be chances when that will be the case but there will also be scenarios when you will only have 5% chance to hit). For me the ranged touch attack vs saving throw is a stylistic choice. Depending on the opponent the former might be a better choice than the latter but it is far from "all the time the former trumps the latter". Third, they're both energy based. Okay. For me Abjuration, Conjuration, and Evocation had energy subtypes. Evocation just tends to have more of them. Fourth, I'm not denying that the Orb spells aren't great single target spells. They are. But so what? I don't think single target spells are the forte of Evocation. It's spells that damage multiple targets. And the Orbs don't occupy that particular niche. It's giving the chance to do 10d6 damage at multiple targets for 15d6 at just one. Fifth, what I think is the heart of the argument is that the Orb spells ignores SR. Evocation spells simply don't have such a counterpart. That I think is what we should be discussing. Not the other "red herrings". And even assuming the Orbs are imbalanced, it's not dethroning the school of Evocation. I still can't hit multiple targets with the Orb spells at the same damage output. Evocation can. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No spell resistance vs. Orb spells? Why?
Top