Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No spell resistance vs. Orb spells? Why?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rystil Arden" data-source="post: 3451396" data-attributes="member: 29014"><p>No, I'm saying that taking them leads the discussion to a place of comparing feat optimisation where it probably shouldn't go (because if I use those two feats for the Conjurer to make the Conjurer even stronger, you could then claim that it's only because of those two feats).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why yes. Yes I am. In fact, you've hit the nail on the head. For direct damage anyway, and that's what we're talking about here. The spells are just that broken. Notice that they do slightly more damage than the Evoker in the example <em>before applying</em> SR. There is no possible reason to prepare Polar Ray over Twinned Orb of X (uses the same slot for much more damage even without SR, and extremely more damage with SR). With Orbs in existence (if you don't take the better way out and houserule them to allow SR, of course), SR no longer matters because your staple attack spell doesn't allow it. The old spells that ignore SR deal tidbits of damage over time, and often less than the Evocation spell does up front even after all the time (unless the enemies are somehow forced to stay in an area spell), so you actually have to think about which to pick. Orbs are right now, they do slightly more damage without SR, and they ignore SR. Thus they make SR obsolete. Let's examine the possible situations if you don't believe:</p><p></p><p>The Old Way when Orbs didn't exist--</p><p></p><p>Situation 1: Enemy doesn't have SR--Optimally you would cast an Evocation, since they do much more damage than the Conjuration equivalents and they do it right now. You have to prepare some Evocations so that you can do this though. If you're stuck with only Conjurations you're in trouble.</p><p>Situation 2: Enemy has SR--Optimally you would cast a Conjuration spell that ignores SR, but if you're any good at caster level, the Evocation with the SR chance actually looks attractive here too, but either way, the presence of SR lowers your damage output.</p><p></p><p>Now With Orbs:</p><p></p><p>Situation 1: Enemy doesn't have SR--Cast Orb and do slightly more damage or cast Evocations for slightly less--we should prepare the Orbs in case of below, though</p><p>Situation 2: Enemy has SR--cast Orb, ignore the SR, and do massively more damage than the Evocation, and the same as the Orb did to the no-SR guy. Because we prepare the Orb either way, SR didn't matter at all--it is rendered irrelevant.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rystil Arden, post: 3451396, member: 29014"] No, I'm saying that taking them leads the discussion to a place of comparing feat optimisation where it probably shouldn't go (because if I use those two feats for the Conjurer to make the Conjurer even stronger, you could then claim that it's only because of those two feats). Why yes. Yes I am. In fact, you've hit the nail on the head. For direct damage anyway, and that's what we're talking about here. The spells are just that broken. Notice that they do slightly more damage than the Evoker in the example [I]before applying[/I] SR. There is no possible reason to prepare Polar Ray over Twinned Orb of X (uses the same slot for much more damage even without SR, and extremely more damage with SR). With Orbs in existence (if you don't take the better way out and houserule them to allow SR, of course), SR no longer matters because your staple attack spell doesn't allow it. The old spells that ignore SR deal tidbits of damage over time, and often less than the Evocation spell does up front even after all the time (unless the enemies are somehow forced to stay in an area spell), so you actually have to think about which to pick. Orbs are right now, they do slightly more damage without SR, and they ignore SR. Thus they make SR obsolete. Let's examine the possible situations if you don't believe: The Old Way when Orbs didn't exist-- Situation 1: Enemy doesn't have SR--Optimally you would cast an Evocation, since they do much more damage than the Conjuration equivalents and they do it right now. You have to prepare some Evocations so that you can do this though. If you're stuck with only Conjurations you're in trouble. Situation 2: Enemy has SR--Optimally you would cast a Conjuration spell that ignores SR, but if you're any good at caster level, the Evocation with the SR chance actually looks attractive here too, but either way, the presence of SR lowers your damage output. Now With Orbs: Situation 1: Enemy doesn't have SR--Cast Orb and do slightly more damage or cast Evocations for slightly less--we should prepare the Orbs in case of below, though Situation 2: Enemy has SR--cast Orb, ignore the SR, and do massively more damage than the Evocation, and the same as the Orb did to the no-SR guy. Because we prepare the Orb either way, SR didn't matter at all--it is rendered irrelevant. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No spell resistance vs. Orb spells? Why?
Top