Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No spell resistance vs. Orb spells? Why?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 3453849" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Buff spells get cast in the game and are an integral part of DND combat, regardless of denials. Stat boost items are an integral part of DND, regardless of denials.</p><p></p><p>Orbs have a very minor to hit roll, no save for half damage, no SR, and the potential for double damage (and the 4th level version has a save for some other game affect which very few single target Evocation spells have). That means that it is energy damage magic practically without a game mechanic to determine if it works or not (the one it has rarely prevents it from not occurring).</p><p></p><p></p><p>I notice that the pro-Orb side is blowing off the fact that the average touch AC in the Monster Manual is 10.5 and 93% of creatures in it have a touch AC of 14 or less. Even without <strong>any</strong> additional magic whatsoever, a 10th level arcane caster could still hit 95% against an average touch AC from the MM. Add in the fact that people do play their PCs with buff spells, feats, special abilities, and items and the math becomes overwhelming.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Without any magic spells or items whatsoever, I can easily create an arcane caster who specializes in Orb spells who hits an average touch AC creature in the MM (we'll make it AC 11) 95% of the time by 8th level:</p><p></p><p>Dex 14 Halfling which makes it Dex 16</p><p></p><p>01 70% Point Blank Shot</p><p>02 75%</p><p>03 75% Precise Shot</p><p>04 80%</p><p>05 80%</p><p>06 90% Weapon Focus</p><p>07 90%</p><p>08 95%</p><p></p><p>And really for such a specialist, only Point Blank Shot and Precise Shot is really needed for the game (Precise Shot is needed in order to help pick off creatures already in melee combat).</p><p></p><p></p><p>But, the pro-Orb side is really missing the point of the math. It does not matter if it is 95% or 70% or whatever for a given arcane caster. Compared to other first and fourth level single target spells with a saving throw, Orbs affect their targets a higher percentage of the time and because they do such nice damage, they often force their opponents to waste time fleeing or healing (at least in our campaigns, an opponent does not always fight to the death when he is 50% or more damaged in round one).</p><p></p><p>And against Arcane casters, the 4th level Orb spell can be practically a death sentence with few defenses for a same level enemy arcane caster in round one . D6 per level is a high percentage of the hit points of most arcane casters (unless of course, pro-Orb people are now going to argue that arcane casters walk around with Con boost items, but not Dex boost items <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> ).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 3453849, member: 2011"] Buff spells get cast in the game and are an integral part of DND combat, regardless of denials. Stat boost items are an integral part of DND, regardless of denials. Orbs have a very minor to hit roll, no save for half damage, no SR, and the potential for double damage (and the 4th level version has a save for some other game affect which very few single target Evocation spells have). That means that it is energy damage magic practically without a game mechanic to determine if it works or not (the one it has rarely prevents it from not occurring). I notice that the pro-Orb side is blowing off the fact that the average touch AC in the Monster Manual is 10.5 and 93% of creatures in it have a touch AC of 14 or less. Even without [b]any[/b] additional magic whatsoever, a 10th level arcane caster could still hit 95% against an average touch AC from the MM. Add in the fact that people do play their PCs with buff spells, feats, special abilities, and items and the math becomes overwhelming. Without any magic spells or items whatsoever, I can easily create an arcane caster who specializes in Orb spells who hits an average touch AC creature in the MM (we'll make it AC 11) 95% of the time by 8th level: Dex 14 Halfling which makes it Dex 16 01 70% Point Blank Shot 02 75% 03 75% Precise Shot 04 80% 05 80% 06 90% Weapon Focus 07 90% 08 95% And really for such a specialist, only Point Blank Shot and Precise Shot is really needed for the game (Precise Shot is needed in order to help pick off creatures already in melee combat). But, the pro-Orb side is really missing the point of the math. It does not matter if it is 95% or 70% or whatever for a given arcane caster. Compared to other first and fourth level single target spells with a saving throw, Orbs affect their targets a higher percentage of the time and because they do such nice damage, they often force their opponents to waste time fleeing or healing (at least in our campaigns, an opponent does not always fight to the death when he is 50% or more damaged in round one). And against Arcane casters, the 4th level Orb spell can be practically a death sentence with few defenses for a same level enemy arcane caster in round one . D6 per level is a high percentage of the hit points of most arcane casters (unless of course, pro-Orb people are now going to argue that arcane casters walk around with Con boost items, but not Dex boost items :lol: ). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No spell resistance vs. Orb spells? Why?
Top