Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No spell resistance vs. Orb spells? Why?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="evilbob" data-source="post: 3459472" data-attributes="member: 9789"><p>Ah, you're right - wow, totally don't know what I was doing there. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p>Hmm... I guess this is a matter of interpretation. Depending on how you approach the situation, there's a lot to be said for a red dragon understanding its weakness and doing <em>something</em> to account for it. However, if we're going for "a totally surprised dragon" (that doesn't have feats from the Dragonomicon, or contengency spells, or any pre-buffs other than 30 resistance) and again ignoring it making any smart moves, you're right. x1.5 easily puts the damage range into "autokill" without a problem.</p><p>Really? Admixture gives you avg. 52.5 * 1.5 (cold) + avg. 52.5 (other element) = 131.25. Maximized gives you 90 * 1.5 = 135. Besides the fact that maximized gives you a greater reliability, it also gives a higher number. Unless you're saying you could admixture (cold) and (cold), in which case, yes it would give you a slightly higher average damage (157.5).</p><p>Um... yeah. I mean, again if you're saying the wizard would spend a lot of time buffing or buying items to prepare or something, then it would be higher - but then you might as well allow the red dragon to cast a few of his own upper-level spells, too. But seriously, I thought I'd be generous with a 12 Con. I'd guess some wizards have more, but typically even upper level wizards don't get a lot more. Wizards don't have HP because wizards don't get hit. If you're playing a wizard and you get hit by something (or at least, if you get hit by TWO somethings), then you're not playing a very good wizard.</p><p></p><p>But still, let's say the wizard had a Con of 18. That's way high, but that still only gives him 99 HP. That's still under average for the breath weapon.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Honestly, I understand your math, but I think you're presenting an idealized situation. Two 15th level casters, prepared to the gills, knowing what they're fighting, buffed all up, are going to do SERIOUS damage to anything, anywhere, anytime. That said, there should be no way they could guarentee to kill the dragon in 1 round, even with the orb spells. And if they cannot kill the dragon in 1 round, they will not kill the dragon without more of a plan than what you've presented. As I said, 1 4th level spell ruins this plan completely. And of course, 1 full attack against any mage by a dragon is far more likely to work than these orb spells.</p><p></p><p>As I believe someone earlier has stated, in order to prove that these spells are broken, you will need to show that they are broken in a common sort of occurance. This setup is so far from common - or even unusual - that it fails to convince me as an argument.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, I think it is amazing that two wizards, fully prepared and with lots of planning could get very close to guarenteeing that they could down a CR 24 red dragon under ideal circumstances. I just don't think that warrants rewriting a spell.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="evilbob, post: 3459472, member: 9789"] Ah, you're right - wow, totally don't know what I was doing there. :) Hmm... I guess this is a matter of interpretation. Depending on how you approach the situation, there's a lot to be said for a red dragon understanding its weakness and doing [I]something[/I] to account for it. However, if we're going for "a totally surprised dragon" (that doesn't have feats from the Dragonomicon, or contengency spells, or any pre-buffs other than 30 resistance) and again ignoring it making any smart moves, you're right. x1.5 easily puts the damage range into "autokill" without a problem. Really? Admixture gives you avg. 52.5 * 1.5 (cold) + avg. 52.5 (other element) = 131.25. Maximized gives you 90 * 1.5 = 135. Besides the fact that maximized gives you a greater reliability, it also gives a higher number. Unless you're saying you could admixture (cold) and (cold), in which case, yes it would give you a slightly higher average damage (157.5). Um... yeah. I mean, again if you're saying the wizard would spend a lot of time buffing or buying items to prepare or something, then it would be higher - but then you might as well allow the red dragon to cast a few of his own upper-level spells, too. But seriously, I thought I'd be generous with a 12 Con. I'd guess some wizards have more, but typically even upper level wizards don't get a lot more. Wizards don't have HP because wizards don't get hit. If you're playing a wizard and you get hit by something (or at least, if you get hit by TWO somethings), then you're not playing a very good wizard. But still, let's say the wizard had a Con of 18. That's way high, but that still only gives him 99 HP. That's still under average for the breath weapon. Honestly, I understand your math, but I think you're presenting an idealized situation. Two 15th level casters, prepared to the gills, knowing what they're fighting, buffed all up, are going to do SERIOUS damage to anything, anywhere, anytime. That said, there should be no way they could guarentee to kill the dragon in 1 round, even with the orb spells. And if they cannot kill the dragon in 1 round, they will not kill the dragon without more of a plan than what you've presented. As I said, 1 4th level spell ruins this plan completely. And of course, 1 full attack against any mage by a dragon is far more likely to work than these orb spells. As I believe someone earlier has stated, in order to prove that these spells are broken, you will need to show that they are broken in a common sort of occurance. This setup is so far from common - or even unusual - that it fails to convince me as an argument. Again, I think it is amazing that two wizards, fully prepared and with lots of planning could get very close to guarenteeing that they could down a CR 24 red dragon under ideal circumstances. I just don't think that warrants rewriting a spell. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No spell resistance vs. Orb spells? Why?
Top