Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No spell resistance vs. Orb spells? Why?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 3468385" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>But that rule only applies to objects and creatures.</p><p></p><p>It is inapplicable to the discussion at hand.</p><p></p><p>Who is changing RAW now?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And creates an even worse inconsistency. Orbs are both magical and non-magical when they hit their target.</p><p></p><p>Compared to the lack of conjuration creation energy rules, that is a pretty big inconsistency (in fact, I do not really see an inconsistency with Conjuration Creation and its spells as much as I see a missing rule).</p><p></p><p>Not only that, but replacing "objects and creatures" with "objects and effects" drops creatures from the Conjuration Creation school completely. You are <strong><u>adding</u></strong> a new inconsistency for Phantom Steed to resolve your (supposed) inconsistencies for non-object conjuration creations (which can be easily resolved by just realizing that there are no conjuration creation non-objects non-creature explicit rules).</p><p></p><p></p><p>And even if one changes the general conjuration creation rules to objects, creatures, or effects (by cumulatively adding the Conjuration School rule with the Conjuration Creation Subschool rules), it still does not imply that one should change the instantaneous conjuration creation rule to objects, creatures, or effects.</p><p></p><p>So, even doing it for the non-instantaneous cases (31 out of 33 of the rest of the spells in the PHB) does not mean that one should do it for the instantaneous cases.</p><p></p><p>In fact, the easiest way to resolve your inconsistency is to just claim that the Conjuration Creation spells in the book are Conjuration Creation spells. Period. End of story. No need for the instantaneous energy one in the PHB to match the object and creature rule. That's a rules change.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It's pretty obvious that WotC never considered allowing Orbs to bust through AMFs, or they would have mentioned it somewhere. Hence, I consider your position on this to not match RAW nor match designer intent. It appears to just be your preference and has nothing to do with rules at all.</p><p></p><p>When we add the fact that Conjuration Creation Instantaneous spells just flat out should not create (more potent than Evocation) Energy Effects (and many people agree that WotC foobared on this), it just seems nonsensical to change yet another literal RAW rule to make Orbs even more potent.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 3468385, member: 2011"] But that rule only applies to objects and creatures. It is inapplicable to the discussion at hand. Who is changing RAW now? And creates an even worse inconsistency. Orbs are both magical and non-magical when they hit their target. Compared to the lack of conjuration creation energy rules, that is a pretty big inconsistency (in fact, I do not really see an inconsistency with Conjuration Creation and its spells as much as I see a missing rule). Not only that, but replacing "objects and creatures" with "objects and effects" drops creatures from the Conjuration Creation school completely. You are [b][u]adding[/u][/b] a new inconsistency for Phantom Steed to resolve your (supposed) inconsistencies for non-object conjuration creations (which can be easily resolved by just realizing that there are no conjuration creation non-objects non-creature explicit rules). And even if one changes the general conjuration creation rules to objects, creatures, or effects (by cumulatively adding the Conjuration School rule with the Conjuration Creation Subschool rules), it still does not imply that one should change the instantaneous conjuration creation rule to objects, creatures, or effects. So, even doing it for the non-instantaneous cases (31 out of 33 of the rest of the spells in the PHB) does not mean that one should do it for the instantaneous cases. In fact, the easiest way to resolve your inconsistency is to just claim that the Conjuration Creation spells in the book are Conjuration Creation spells. Period. End of story. No need for the instantaneous energy one in the PHB to match the object and creature rule. That's a rules change. It's pretty obvious that WotC never considered allowing Orbs to bust through AMFs, or they would have mentioned it somewhere. Hence, I consider your position on this to not match RAW nor match designer intent. It appears to just be your preference and has nothing to do with rules at all. When we add the fact that Conjuration Creation Instantaneous spells just flat out should not create (more potent than Evocation) Energy Effects (and many people agree that WotC foobared on this), it just seems nonsensical to change yet another literal RAW rule to make Orbs even more potent. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No spell resistance vs. Orb spells? Why?
Top