Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No spell resistance vs. Orb spells? Why?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pssthpok" data-source="post: 3481046" data-attributes="member: 34725"><p>I think I've made clear why I feel my points are true, but we can go back and forth. En garde! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I haven't put words in anyone else's mouth, I'm just stating what I consider a fact. Just because the orbs don't acknowledge SR -- since the magic involved conjured non-magical substances -- doesn't spell 'end-game' to me. Yes, it's a powerful option, but one that has very elementary defenses.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Polar Ray does 10d6 more damage and similarly offers no save, however; no one is complaining about that here. Why? SR, apparently, and maybe spell level. SR is a golden idol that to tread on is tantamount to insulting? Really, is polar ray's spell level saving it from scrutiny? If the orb spells were 7th level or 8th level, with an appropriate increase in damage (say 20d6 for the elements and 15d6 for the force) would this thread be 10 pages long?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No need for the splatbooks; stick to the Core Rules. And you don't <strong>have</strong> to do it, but the very fact that it could be done will only go to prove <em>nothing</em> but the fact that two resourceful and clever debaters will never win the other over to their side given a strong enough well of resources from which to draw their counter points. This means that the orb argument is dead in the water and comes down to subjective scrutiny. In my mind, the orb spells are too easily countered to cause such a fuss. But that argument goes out like a moth in a flame as soon as someone acquiesces to Twin and Admix.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, the math looks good on paper, but these feats stack until the cows come home. Admix fire and acid? Sure. Empower twice? No. Twin and admix? Sure. Empower more than once?</p><p></p><p>Lemme check one more time...</p><p></p><p>... uh... no. With a good setup these feats start to look cheesy; take them into epic and they stink up the whole house. Twin is broken because it's Quicken without the loss of another spell slot or swift action for the round. Yeah, it only doubles up one spell, so tactical options are out, but who needs tactics when you're flinging two admixed orbs with each action?</p><p></p><p>So, no: Admix and Twin are not fine, they are strongly open to serious abuse and are the primary cause of spells like polar ray or the orbs looking too powerful on the table. But its not their fault, these spells. It's the fault of boxed-in DMs and cheesy metamagic feats.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pssthpok, post: 3481046, member: 34725"] I think I've made clear why I feel my points are true, but we can go back and forth. En garde! :) I haven't put words in anyone else's mouth, I'm just stating what I consider a fact. Just because the orbs don't acknowledge SR -- since the magic involved conjured non-magical substances -- doesn't spell 'end-game' to me. Yes, it's a powerful option, but one that has very elementary defenses. Polar Ray does 10d6 more damage and similarly offers no save, however; no one is complaining about that here. Why? SR, apparently, and maybe spell level. SR is a golden idol that to tread on is tantamount to insulting? Really, is polar ray's spell level saving it from scrutiny? If the orb spells were 7th level or 8th level, with an appropriate increase in damage (say 20d6 for the elements and 15d6 for the force) would this thread be 10 pages long? No need for the splatbooks; stick to the Core Rules. And you don't [b]have[/b] to do it, but the very fact that it could be done will only go to prove [i]nothing[/i] but the fact that two resourceful and clever debaters will never win the other over to their side given a strong enough well of resources from which to draw their counter points. This means that the orb argument is dead in the water and comes down to subjective scrutiny. In my mind, the orb spells are too easily countered to cause such a fuss. But that argument goes out like a moth in a flame as soon as someone acquiesces to Twin and Admix. Yes, the math looks good on paper, but these feats stack until the cows come home. Admix fire and acid? Sure. Empower twice? No. Twin and admix? Sure. Empower more than once? Lemme check one more time... ... uh... no. With a good setup these feats start to look cheesy; take them into epic and they stink up the whole house. Twin is broken because it's Quicken without the loss of another spell slot or swift action for the round. Yeah, it only doubles up one spell, so tactical options are out, but who needs tactics when you're flinging two admixed orbs with each action? So, no: Admix and Twin are not fine, they are strongly open to serious abuse and are the primary cause of spells like polar ray or the orbs looking too powerful on the table. But its not their fault, these spells. It's the fault of boxed-in DMs and cheesy metamagic feats. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
No spell resistance vs. Orb spells? Why?
Top