Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
No two people ever seem to play D&D the same way, but we can usually find people to play with anyway.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Swarmkeeper" data-source="post: 8282722" data-attributes="member: 6921763"><p>I come to ENWorld to continue to learn and improve the gameplay at our tables (where we play 5e). I hope to also pay it forward here by sharing in my own words what I've learned from other posters as well as outside resources that have benefited our groups. By sharing, it becomes a positive feedback loop for me as I'm better able to engrain a concept into how I run and play 5e.</p><p></p><p>I'm glad for the varied viewpoints brought to bear in these discussions as they help me discover new ideas and new ways of looking at how I run a game - and also help challenge, and often strengthen, how I already approach the game. </p><p></p><p>Of course, sometimes it's a matter of separating the wheat from the chaff in discussions. Sometimes posters are arguing for the sake of arguing and under no circumstance will back down to admit there is another way to look at things or that they might outright be wrong. That is of course magnified by the anonymous nature of the forum (as others have mentioned upthread).</p><p>Also, sometimes posters are arguing under false pretenses - and, likely most often, not doing so deliberately. They may be indicating that a rule or ruling is wrong when they a. haven't really read the DMG/PHB fully to hold a deep understanding of the rule (raises hand sheepishly as something I've done in the past), and/or b. are misunderstanding the assumptions behind the debate (yep, been here too), and/or c. don't actually play the edition being discussed or are bringing in assumptions from other editions/games. Any of these can lead to obfuscation and frustration and make it appear that our games are more disparate than the same. </p><p></p><p>At the end of the day, if we actually played in the game of another forum poster with whom we seem to disagree, I think such a game more often than not may actually run IRL much the same as our own with perhaps some minor adjustments (which may or may not be annoyances) - and fun would be had.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Swarmkeeper, post: 8282722, member: 6921763"] I come to ENWorld to continue to learn and improve the gameplay at our tables (where we play 5e). I hope to also pay it forward here by sharing in my own words what I've learned from other posters as well as outside resources that have benefited our groups. By sharing, it becomes a positive feedback loop for me as I'm better able to engrain a concept into how I run and play 5e. I'm glad for the varied viewpoints brought to bear in these discussions as they help me discover new ideas and new ways of looking at how I run a game - and also help challenge, and often strengthen, how I already approach the game. Of course, sometimes it's a matter of separating the wheat from the chaff in discussions. Sometimes posters are arguing for the sake of arguing and under no circumstance will back down to admit there is another way to look at things or that they might outright be wrong. That is of course magnified by the anonymous nature of the forum (as others have mentioned upthread). Also, sometimes posters are arguing under false pretenses - and, likely most often, not doing so deliberately. They may be indicating that a rule or ruling is wrong when they a. haven't really read the DMG/PHB fully to hold a deep understanding of the rule (raises hand sheepishly as something I've done in the past), and/or b. are misunderstanding the assumptions behind the debate (yep, been here too), and/or c. don't actually play the edition being discussed or are bringing in assumptions from other editions/games. Any of these can lead to obfuscation and frustration and make it appear that our games are more disparate than the same. At the end of the day, if we actually played in the game of another forum poster with whom we seem to disagree, I think such a game more often than not may actually run IRL much the same as our own with perhaps some minor adjustments (which may or may not be annoyances) - and fun would be had. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
No two people ever seem to play D&D the same way, but we can usually find people to play with anyway.
Top