Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Nominations are up!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="woodelf" data-source="post: 2944686" data-attributes="member: 10201"><p>[i had a longer, more in-depth post here, but my webbrowser crashed, so the 2nd time around it's a bit briefer.]</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, the only people who should really have a say in the awards are the fans & consumers. The publishers most definitely should <em>not</em> be making any of the decisions. It's precisely those being judged also deciding how the judging should occur that has ruined many other awards, both RPG and otherwise. And by 'ruined', i mean making them irrelevant to the people they're supposed to be informing: the fans/consumers.</p><p></p><p>So, yes, you *can* just ignore the companies. It's the companies who can't just ignore the awards (or, at least, that's the way it should be). The communication path sholud be the consumers/fans telling the awards ceremony how to do things, and then the awards criteria influencing how the publishers behave. It's perfectly acceptable for the publishers to tailor their products to the awards--in fact, if the awards are doing their job (reflecting fan/consumer priorities), it's a very good thing--but the awards should not be tailoring their criteria to the publisher's demands/desires. </p><p></p><p>Now, that's in a perfect world. In the actual RPG world, the line between consumer and publisher is mighty slim, and plenty of people outright obliterate that line. So what that means is we just need to consider the motives and impact of criticisms/suggestions, since simply considering the source won't be sufficient. IOW, while my comments as a publisher should be ignored, or at least given minimal weight, my comments as a consumer should be taken seriously. And i'll do my best to be honest in differentiating between the two, and the awards people have to exercise some judgement in determining if i've succeeded. And i think we can trust most other publishers/creators in this industry to do the same--as evidenced by several comments in this thread, already.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="woodelf, post: 2944686, member: 10201"] [i had a longer, more in-depth post here, but my webbrowser crashed, so the 2nd time around it's a bit briefer.] Actually, the only people who should really have a say in the awards are the fans & consumers. The publishers most definitely should [i]not[/i] be making any of the decisions. It's precisely those being judged also deciding how the judging should occur that has ruined many other awards, both RPG and otherwise. And by 'ruined', i mean making them irrelevant to the people they're supposed to be informing: the fans/consumers. So, yes, you *can* just ignore the companies. It's the companies who can't just ignore the awards (or, at least, that's the way it should be). The communication path sholud be the consumers/fans telling the awards ceremony how to do things, and then the awards criteria influencing how the publishers behave. It's perfectly acceptable for the publishers to tailor their products to the awards--in fact, if the awards are doing their job (reflecting fan/consumer priorities), it's a very good thing--but the awards should not be tailoring their criteria to the publisher's demands/desires. Now, that's in a perfect world. In the actual RPG world, the line between consumer and publisher is mighty slim, and plenty of people outright obliterate that line. So what that means is we just need to consider the motives and impact of criticisms/suggestions, since simply considering the source won't be sufficient. IOW, while my comments as a publisher should be ignored, or at least given minimal weight, my comments as a consumer should be taken seriously. And i'll do my best to be honest in differentiating between the two, and the awards people have to exercise some judgement in determining if i've succeeded. And i think we can trust most other publishers/creators in this industry to do the same--as evidenced by several comments in this thread, already. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Nominations are up!!
Top