Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Non-AC Defenses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rothe_" data-source="post: 4979650" data-attributes="member: 84765"><p>I actually think that 4e encourages focusing on one area of expertise. When you do a character like this, some people then say is an example of making a "one trick pony" character.</p><p> </p><p>I disagree. I think that one trick ponies exist, but they are even more specialised than just someone putting an 18 in one stat. Most of the true one trick ponies are in fact using a ton of feats and items to make their tactic work (often just using one at-will repeatedly) whereas a focused character can still make use of several tactics and still have his "18" stat.</p><p> </p><p>I actually think the game is more fun with focused characters working as a team than having a team of broadly skilled characters. With broad range of "average" abilities, your characters end up having more similarities which I don't think is anything to aim at.</p><p> </p><p>So, back to the actual subject. Even if you do have 18 in stat(s), you should still not be totally gimped for having low NAD's. Maybe one defense can be really low, but that is part of the game - it should not be a big problem unless the DM purposefully overuses attacks vs. one specific defense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rothe_, post: 4979650, member: 84765"] I actually think that 4e encourages focusing on one area of expertise. When you do a character like this, some people then say is an example of making a "one trick pony" character. I disagree. I think that one trick ponies exist, but they are even more specialised than just someone putting an 18 in one stat. Most of the true one trick ponies are in fact using a ton of feats and items to make their tactic work (often just using one at-will repeatedly) whereas a focused character can still make use of several tactics and still have his "18" stat. I actually think the game is more fun with focused characters working as a team than having a team of broadly skilled characters. With broad range of "average" abilities, your characters end up having more similarities which I don't think is anything to aim at. So, back to the actual subject. Even if you do have 18 in stat(s), you should still not be totally gimped for having low NAD's. Maybe one defense can be really low, but that is part of the game - it should not be a big problem unless the DM purposefully overuses attacks vs. one specific defense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Non-AC Defenses
Top