Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Non-AC Defenses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Davachido" data-source="post: 4981012" data-attributes="member: 85919"><p>I think the NADs at the moment are quite decent, maybe not perfect put still works to a good extend if we take into account all abilities. I think too many players try to only do damage and forget about statuses/defenses. </p><p> </p><p>I'll give an example, currently I have 2 groups running the same campaign (heroic tier atm) doing the same mission the first group got hit a load, and the other were able to beat most of the groups barely taking any damage. </p><p> </p><p>The difference was how the defender in each group was built, the first defender didn't take the feat or powers to do full out defending whereas the 2nd group had a defender that did nothing but that. In numeric terms:</p><p> </p><p>Baseline hit for monsters: rolling 8s to hit PCs</p><p>Mark: -2 to hit</p><p>Feats: (+1 def) Varying but at level 3 was able to boost defense by +1 for anything the defender was marking.</p><p>Extras: People using powers to up the defenses or using second winds/total defense.</p><p> </p><p>Total: 11+ on NADs (13-16 if powers came into play)</p><p> </p><p>This was only with one feat on the fighter, using mutlitarget hits to mark more targets. At later levels you have even more tools to be able to lower attacks again. </p><p> </p><p>For example a paladin + rattling rogue, again numeric example:</p><p> </p><p>Assuming hit for paragon tier on NADs: 7</p><p>Mark: -2 to hit</p><p>Rogue: -2 to hit</p><p>Powers: -2 to hit (varying but you can pull this off with an at-will)</p><p> </p><p>Total: 13+ on NADs (this can increase depending on other powers/feats used to boost defenses)</p><p> </p><p>So no feats in play here, paragon tier synergy between to party members to make it more difficult for the monsters. I have often found that if there is a good defender/controller/supporter (striker helping debuff) then the party doesn't get hit that much.</p><p> </p><p>Of course there is still the problem that there is always members with a lower defense than the others except maybe for the defenders, but I think this was inbuilt because even the monsters have one lower defense than the others and the DMG states this. The DMG also says not to tell your players which defense is the lowest for the monster.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Summary: In my opinion the design intent was to make the defenders let the to-hits drop to about the 50% line then feats/other powers to drop the hit to 25-40%. Although as I stated before it ain't perfect some tweaks could be done, I'm just not sure of the best way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Davachido, post: 4981012, member: 85919"] I think the NADs at the moment are quite decent, maybe not perfect put still works to a good extend if we take into account all abilities. I think too many players try to only do damage and forget about statuses/defenses. I'll give an example, currently I have 2 groups running the same campaign (heroic tier atm) doing the same mission the first group got hit a load, and the other were able to beat most of the groups barely taking any damage. The difference was how the defender in each group was built, the first defender didn't take the feat or powers to do full out defending whereas the 2nd group had a defender that did nothing but that. In numeric terms: Baseline hit for monsters: rolling 8s to hit PCs Mark: -2 to hit Feats: (+1 def) Varying but at level 3 was able to boost defense by +1 for anything the defender was marking. Extras: People using powers to up the defenses or using second winds/total defense. Total: 11+ on NADs (13-16 if powers came into play) This was only with one feat on the fighter, using mutlitarget hits to mark more targets. At later levels you have even more tools to be able to lower attacks again. For example a paladin + rattling rogue, again numeric example: Assuming hit for paragon tier on NADs: 7 Mark: -2 to hit Rogue: -2 to hit Powers: -2 to hit (varying but you can pull this off with an at-will) Total: 13+ on NADs (this can increase depending on other powers/feats used to boost defenses) So no feats in play here, paragon tier synergy between to party members to make it more difficult for the monsters. I have often found that if there is a good defender/controller/supporter (striker helping debuff) then the party doesn't get hit that much. Of course there is still the problem that there is always members with a lower defense than the others except maybe for the defenders, but I think this was inbuilt because even the monsters have one lower defense than the others and the DMG states this. The DMG also says not to tell your players which defense is the lowest for the monster. Summary: In my opinion the design intent was to make the defenders let the to-hits drop to about the 50% line then feats/other powers to drop the hit to 25-40%. Although as I stated before it ain't perfect some tweaks could be done, I'm just not sure of the best way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Non-AC Defenses
Top