Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Non-AC Defenses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="eamon" data-source="post: 4981626" data-attributes="member: 51942"><p>When analyzing these things, it's worth keeping in mind that an improvement to a low defense matters less than an improvement to a high defense. Roughly speaking, raising your defense by 10 from hit-on-2+ to hit-on-12+ halves your damage and thus doubles your life expectancy. Then raising your defenses by just 4 or 5 again halves your damage and doubles your life expectancy.</p><p></p><p>Assuming a monster crit is about 50% more powerful than a hit, eventually, raising your defense from hit-on 19 <em><span style="font-size: 9px">[expected damage: 5% * a hit + 5% a crit ~ <strong>12.5%</strong> a hit]</span></em> to hit on twenty <em><span style="font-size: 9px">[<strong>7.5%</strong> of a hit]</span></em> is a 40% damage reduction for just one point. Raising it to miss-on twenty <em><span style="font-size: 9px">[<strong>5%</strong> of a hit]</span></em> decreases damage taken by another 33% for one point of defense.</p><p></p><p>Basically, it just doesn't matter all that much whether a monster hits you on a 4 or a 7 - and it matters even less whether he'll hit you on a 2 or a 3, or, worse yet, on a 1<span style="font-size: 9px">(effectively 2)</span> or a 2 which is truly no change.</p><p></p><p>In short, there's no point in bothering with the lowest defense unless you can somehow manage to raise it by enough to make it competitive.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">The House Rule</span></p><p>What does this mean about the house-rule which raises FRW at 5/15/25? Well, that house rule is good and works well for your <em>strongest </em>two defenses, which thus remain competitive. It doesn't hurt your weakest defense either, but it won't be significant; that would require even further raises.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span><span style="font-size: 15px">Fixing the lowest defense</span></p><p>There's three choices here. (1) don't fix it. (2) use feats. (3) use stat raises. WotC basically does (1). The feat fixes (without above house-rule) are needed to just keep the highest defenses competitive - they're not enough for the lowest defense, and in fact, a player would be wasting a feat if he tried raising his lowest defense with such a feat (so the feats are both overpowered and underpowered simultaneously - great).</p><p></p><p>Using (2) is hard - and some might object to a feat tax. It's hard because any feat you make will be much much more attractive to use on the <em>high</em> defenses - where such a feat would be overpowered. I don't think that's a good idea.</p><p></p><p>Using stat raises is comparatively easy; just raise all stats on levels 4/8 and (in combination with the general 5/15/25 raise) players will lose only 1 point vs. the monsters over their career, which looks OK to me. </p><p></p><p>Such house rules have other nice properties as well. Earlier in this thread, there was some dislike of 18/14/11 builds. Well, if you raise all three stats, all of the sudden your <em>other</em> stats actually have a chance of remaining relevant. After the change, it might actually be worth it to consider raising a tertiary stat to help your weakest defense (and skills, and maybe init or hitpoints). Right now, stat levelling rules basically mean that you never ever should bother investing in non-core stats unless you absolutely need to for feat prereqs. That's pretty lame, and it's a nice side effect that that's no longer the case when you raise all stats. I'm also not too thrilled about the way feat-prerequisites really punish people that don't pre-plan their character 20 levels in advance. Getting rid of those stat prerequisites is probably a good thing - unless it breaks game balance (I can't, off the top of my head, think of any examples thereof, however).</p><p></p><p>It also ameliorates the need for "fixer" feats like heavy armor for Str/Wis Rangers (still attractive, but no longer absolutely required) or like the primal con-to-AC feat (also still attractive for a non-Dex/Int build, but again, not absolutely required).</p><p></p><p>That's a bunch of nice side effects, IMNSHO <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile :-)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="eamon, post: 4981626, member: 51942"] When analyzing these things, it's worth keeping in mind that an improvement to a low defense matters less than an improvement to a high defense. Roughly speaking, raising your defense by 10 from hit-on-2+ to hit-on-12+ halves your damage and thus doubles your life expectancy. Then raising your defenses by just 4 or 5 again halves your damage and doubles your life expectancy. Assuming a monster crit is about 50% more powerful than a hit, eventually, raising your defense from hit-on 19 [I][SIZE=1][expected damage: 5% * a hit + 5% a crit ~ [B]12.5%[/B] a hit][/SIZE][/I] to hit on twenty [I][SIZE=1][[B]7.5%[/B] of a hit][/SIZE][/I] is a 40% damage reduction for just one point. Raising it to miss-on twenty [I][SIZE=1][[B]5%[/B] of a hit][/SIZE][/I] decreases damage taken by another 33% for one point of defense. Basically, it just doesn't matter all that much whether a monster hits you on a 4 or a 7 - and it matters even less whether he'll hit you on a 2 or a 3, or, worse yet, on a 1[SIZE=1](effectively 2)[/SIZE] or a 2 which is truly no change. In short, there's no point in bothering with the lowest defense unless you can somehow manage to raise it by enough to make it competitive. [SIZE=4]The House Rule[/SIZE] What does this mean about the house-rule which raises FRW at 5/15/25? Well, that house rule is good and works well for your [I]strongest [/I]two defenses, which thus remain competitive. It doesn't hurt your weakest defense either, but it won't be significant; that would require even further raises. [SIZE=4] [/SIZE][SIZE=4]Fixing the lowest defense[/SIZE] There's three choices here. (1) don't fix it. (2) use feats. (3) use stat raises. WotC basically does (1). The feat fixes (without above house-rule) are needed to just keep the highest defenses competitive - they're not enough for the lowest defense, and in fact, a player would be wasting a feat if he tried raising his lowest defense with such a feat (so the feats are both overpowered and underpowered simultaneously - great). Using (2) is hard - and some might object to a feat tax. It's hard because any feat you make will be much much more attractive to use on the [I]high[/I] defenses - where such a feat would be overpowered. I don't think that's a good idea. Using stat raises is comparatively easy; just raise all stats on levels 4/8 and (in combination with the general 5/15/25 raise) players will lose only 1 point vs. the monsters over their career, which looks OK to me. Such house rules have other nice properties as well. Earlier in this thread, there was some dislike of 18/14/11 builds. Well, if you raise all three stats, all of the sudden your [I]other[/I] stats actually have a chance of remaining relevant. After the change, it might actually be worth it to consider raising a tertiary stat to help your weakest defense (and skills, and maybe init or hitpoints). Right now, stat levelling rules basically mean that you never ever should bother investing in non-core stats unless you absolutely need to for feat prereqs. That's pretty lame, and it's a nice side effect that that's no longer the case when you raise all stats. I'm also not too thrilled about the way feat-prerequisites really punish people that don't pre-plan their character 20 levels in advance. Getting rid of those stat prerequisites is probably a good thing - unless it breaks game balance (I can't, off the top of my head, think of any examples thereof, however). It also ameliorates the need for "fixer" feats like heavy armor for Str/Wis Rangers (still attractive, but no longer absolutely required) or like the primal con-to-AC feat (also still attractive for a non-Dex/Int build, but again, not absolutely required). That's a bunch of nice side effects, IMNSHO :-). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Non-AC Defenses
Top