Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Non-AC Defenses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 4982981" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>The problem isn't with +22 versus NADs at level 15 (although that's ridiculous). It's +17 with a recharge area attack with a same level monster.</p><p></p><p>Only 34% of Paragon level monsters in the Monster Manual have AC-only attacks. 66% of them have one or more attacks that target a NAD.</p><p></p><p>So, the DM can either not use monsters that target NADs, or he can use them.</p><p></p><p>The typical range of the worst NAD at level 15 is from 20 to 25 (10 starting stat +3 item through 13 starting stat +4 item +1 race +1 class).</p><p></p><p>The range for level 15 monsters is +16 through +20. So, the +16 hits on a 4 through 9. The +20 hits on a 2 through 5. The average +18 hits the average NAD 22 on a 4. Note: few PCs have bonuses to race and/or class in their worst NAD.</p><p></p><p>These are same level monsters out of the MM. And, it's ~2/3rds of the monsters (at Paragon level) out of the MM.</p><p></p><p>Is the DM just supposed to throw out these monsters and not use them?</p><p></p><p>For the 15 15th level monsters, there are:</p><p></p><p>[code]</p><p>2 no NAD attacks</p><p>1 +17 encounter area effect</p><p>1 +17 recharge area effect</p><p>1 +16 encounter area effect</p><p>1 +18 at will single target, minor</p><p>1 +19 at will single target plus</p><p> +19 encounter area effect plus</p><p> +19 recharge area effect</p><p>1 +20 immediate reaction at will single target no damage plus</p><p> +20 recharge area effect plus</p><p> +20 encounter area effect</p><p>1 +18 at will single target plus</p><p> +18 encounter single target no damage plus</p><p> +18 recharge area effect</p><p>2 +18 recharge single target</p><p>1 +20 recharge single target</p><p>1 +20 at will single target no damage, minor</p><p>1 +19 encounter area effect no damage</p><p>1 +16 at will single target plus</p><p> +20 two times per encounter single target plus</p><p> +20 recharge single target</p><p>[/code]</p><p></p><p>Only 13% of these monsters do not target NADs. Should the DM not use most of the other 87% of them?</p><p></p><p>And, these are same level monsters. What about higher level monsters? Should the DM never use higher level monsters that target NADs?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 4982981, member: 2011"] The problem isn't with +22 versus NADs at level 15 (although that's ridiculous). It's +17 with a recharge area attack with a same level monster. Only 34% of Paragon level monsters in the Monster Manual have AC-only attacks. 66% of them have one or more attacks that target a NAD. So, the DM can either not use monsters that target NADs, or he can use them. The typical range of the worst NAD at level 15 is from 20 to 25 (10 starting stat +3 item through 13 starting stat +4 item +1 race +1 class). The range for level 15 monsters is +16 through +20. So, the +16 hits on a 4 through 9. The +20 hits on a 2 through 5. The average +18 hits the average NAD 22 on a 4. Note: few PCs have bonuses to race and/or class in their worst NAD. These are same level monsters out of the MM. And, it's ~2/3rds of the monsters (at Paragon level) out of the MM. Is the DM just supposed to throw out these monsters and not use them? For the 15 15th level monsters, there are: [code] 2 no NAD attacks 1 +17 encounter area effect 1 +17 recharge area effect 1 +16 encounter area effect 1 +18 at will single target, minor 1 +19 at will single target plus +19 encounter area effect plus +19 recharge area effect 1 +20 immediate reaction at will single target no damage plus +20 recharge area effect plus +20 encounter area effect 1 +18 at will single target plus +18 encounter single target no damage plus +18 recharge area effect 2 +18 recharge single target 1 +20 recharge single target 1 +20 at will single target no damage, minor 1 +19 encounter area effect no damage 1 +16 at will single target plus +20 two times per encounter single target plus +20 recharge single target [/code] Only 13% of these monsters do not target NADs. Should the DM not use most of the other 87% of them? And, these are same level monsters. What about higher level monsters? Should the DM never use higher level monsters that target NADs? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Non-AC Defenses
Top