Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Non choices: must have and wants why someone that hates something must take it
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 6263207" data-attributes="member: 19675"><p>"Should?" Tough question.</p><p></p><p>The answer is yes if, for instance, one wanted to build a D&D barbarian who has taken a vow that he will only fight with spoons.*</p><p></p><p>Because PC design is, mechanically, all about the allocation of scarce resources, and weapon choices & the like are resources in D&D. And not all choices are equal.</p><p></p><p>There are plenty of fighter feats out there. At low levels, a power attack and monkey grip are mechanically similar.** As you level up, though, power attack is obviously mechanically superior. But only monkey grip lets you use an oversized weapon. For some, that tradeoff is worth it, for some it isn't.</p><p></p><p>Towards the end of 3.5Ed, I came up with the concept of the Mage-Brute. Simply put, that's a full-casting arcanist who wears heavy armor and uses a martial weapon. He doesn't do much combat casting of spells, but finds other ways to use his magical abilities. (I'm not talking Pun-pun or any Polymorph-based builds, I'm talking about playing this way from 1st level, usually in campaigns with limited sourcebooks.)</p><p></p><p>Mechanically, it is a TERRIBLE choice: you're always short on HP (less so if you multiclass), the class-defining abilities are gimped, your BAB suffers, your feat choices are essentially dictated to you. Spell choices for such PCs will be...interesting. You're never going to be the party's Merlin/Elminster/Gandalf/Angel Summoner...nor their Fafhrd/Conan/Roland/Aragorn. You are neither fish nor fowl.</p><p></p><p>But I tell you what- they're cool to play! The look on everyone's face when your 1st level PHB sorcerer in scale mail with a maul advances to one end of a skirmish line...and breathes lightning at the foes, killing most of them? Priceless.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>* if you want all options to be equally badass, you need a system like HERO. In HERO, your spoon barbarian could have equal ability to smack people around with spoons as another PC with a claymore. Or a gun. Or a plasma rifle. Tht same spoon could also let him fly and teleport if you designed it that way, because "spoon" has no mechanical meaning in the game, its just a descriptor.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>** though, it should be noted that monkey grip does not have a Str min, so can be taken by even weak-armed PCs. For them, MG is a superior- indeed one of the ONLY- alternatives to PA for getting a little melee damage boost like that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dannyalcatraz, post: 6263207, member: 19675"] "Should?" Tough question. The answer is yes if, for instance, one wanted to build a D&D barbarian who has taken a vow that he will only fight with spoons.* Because PC design is, mechanically, all about the allocation of scarce resources, and weapon choices & the like are resources in D&D. And not all choices are equal. There are plenty of fighter feats out there. At low levels, a power attack and monkey grip are mechanically similar.** As you level up, though, power attack is obviously mechanically superior. But only monkey grip lets you use an oversized weapon. For some, that tradeoff is worth it, for some it isn't. Towards the end of 3.5Ed, I came up with the concept of the Mage-Brute. Simply put, that's a full-casting arcanist who wears heavy armor and uses a martial weapon. He doesn't do much combat casting of spells, but finds other ways to use his magical abilities. (I'm not talking Pun-pun or any Polymorph-based builds, I'm talking about playing this way from 1st level, usually in campaigns with limited sourcebooks.) Mechanically, it is a TERRIBLE choice: you're always short on HP (less so if you multiclass), the class-defining abilities are gimped, your BAB suffers, your feat choices are essentially dictated to you. Spell choices for such PCs will be...interesting. You're never going to be the party's Merlin/Elminster/Gandalf/Angel Summoner...nor their Fafhrd/Conan/Roland/Aragorn. You are neither fish nor fowl. But I tell you what- they're cool to play! The look on everyone's face when your 1st level PHB sorcerer in scale mail with a maul advances to one end of a skirmish line...and breathes lightning at the foes, killing most of them? Priceless. * if you want all options to be equally badass, you need a system like HERO. In HERO, your spoon barbarian could have equal ability to smack people around with spoons as another PC with a claymore. Or a gun. Or a plasma rifle. Tht same spoon could also let him fly and teleport if you designed it that way, because "spoon" has no mechanical meaning in the game, its just a descriptor. ** though, it should be noted that monkey grip does not have a Str min, so can be taken by even weak-armed PCs. For them, MG is a superior- indeed one of the ONLY- alternatives to PA for getting a little melee damage boost like that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Non choices: must have and wants why someone that hates something must take it
Top