Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Nonlethal Force" data-source="post: 2951199" data-attributes="member: 35788">*Shakes head at the latest RA post**Remembers to thank the almighty power(s) that be for different ways of thinking of things.* <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> I see where you are coming from.  I technically define anything not in the specific "game mechanics section" as flavor text.  But your way makes just as much sense as mine - so not arguing, just asserting an alternet viewpoint.Regardless of what you say, though.  The Duskblade rocks.  The beguiler is cool - but a little too "evil" as written.  They didn't leave much room for a good beguiler.  Sure, they did say beguilers could be of any alignment.  But honestly I think that was more of a reaction to the idiotic alignment restrictions on hexblades.  Personally, I think the beguiler was written with much more of an "evil" slant than the hexblade was in the CW.  Don't get me wrong.  I'd love an opportunity to play a CG or NG Beguiler.Oh - and your analysis of the bard as quoted here:Spot on.  Exactly the same as my first thought when I read the class for the first time.  Well analyzed at reading the fine print.  Although I am of the camp that the bard is better than people think, but still at best a good "fifth" party member.</blockquote>

Verification