Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Reaper Steve" data-source="post: 4045768" data-attributes="member: 51528">Now this is genius! It strikes a fine balance, effectively enhancing play with a simpler system than 1-2-1-2, while still being reasonably close to geometry as we know it.DMShoe... if it's not too late, think about this one. (BTW, thanks for your posts and thoughts. I appreciate your argument, but I still think that 1:1 isn't the best decision, especially when one like this is available.)Ranges and area effects are all 1:1. then in the movement rules, add "the first (and only the first) diagonal move of a creature's turn counts one additional square of movement."Puggins: thanks. I'll keep this in the hip pocket if I stand deal with pure 1:1 but don't want to go ll the way to diagonal = 1.5</blockquote>