Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Burke" data-source="post: 4047506" data-attributes="member: 25216">The funniest part of this debate to me is that my group has always used 1-1-1 movement for squares in 3.5, and it's not even a houserule per se.&nbsp; The other members of the group just never noticed that rule, and must have figured all squares cost the same as the default, as far as I can tell (none of them have ever mentioned it), and I don't want to bring the &quot;correct rule&quot; up because I'm fine with the way it is.&nbsp; So we've just been playing the wrong way.&nbsp; If it's caused any weird tactical effects, they've never bothered any of the other players enough for them to speak up about it.Actually, I have a question.&nbsp; Was this rule in 3.0 too?&nbsp; Because I never noticed the 1-2-1 movement till we switched to 3.5, which means I would have overlooked this rule for a couple years too if it was in 3.0.&nbsp;&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":o" title="Eek!&nbsp; &nbsp; :o"&nbsp; data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":o" /> Oh, and we always do firecubes too.&nbsp; We figured that 20' radius means you can count 2 squares in any direction from the center of the effect and that's what it fills. Completely wrong, I know, but no one in the group has ever challenged it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Burke, post: 4047506, member: 25216"] The funniest part of this debate to me is that my group has always used 1-1-1 movement for squares in 3.5, and it's not even a houserule per se. The other members of the group just never noticed that rule, and must have figured all squares cost the same as the default, as far as I can tell (none of them have ever mentioned it), and I don't want to bring the "correct rule" up because I'm fine with the way it is. So we've just been playing the wrong way. If it's caused any weird tactical effects, they've never bothered any of the other players enough for them to speak up about it. Actually, I have a question. Was this rule in 3.0 too? Because I never noticed the 1-2-1 movement till we switched to 3.5, which means I would have overlooked this rule for a couple years too if it was in 3.0. :o Oh, and we always do firecubes too. We figured that 20' radius means you can count 2 squares in any direction from the center of the effect and that's what it fills. Completely wrong, I know, but no one in the group has ever challenged it. [/QUOTE]

Verification