Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Non-Euclidean Geometry in 4E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 4056593" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>By the rules, yes, it is. A mini has a square base. Even in the pictures in the PHB, they have square bases. The rules state that they have square bases.</p><p></p><p>So, yes, round bases would be wrong.</p><p></p><p>And, yeah, I agree with Merric that the only reason for round bases is aesthetic. By rules, it's not kosher. </p><p></p><p>Now, as far as being bitter or whatever, I use round bases and I couldn't give a toss about the accuracy. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Close enough is more than good enough for me. A 15 foot wide monster can fit in a 15 foot wide corridor regardless of what that battlemap might say.</p><p></p><p>But, we're not talking about my game or your game. We're talking about what the rules ACTUALLY say. I've talked to Hypersmurf far too many times to think that my personal interpretation of the rules is going to hold any water. RAW states that a huge monster has a base 15 feet to a side. That means a 9x9 base using 5 foot squares. That means you get weirdness all over the place.</p><p></p><p>That's my only point in all of this. That 3.5 1-2-1 rules are not any more particularly accurate or realistic than any other abstraction.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 4056593, member: 22779"] By the rules, yes, it is. A mini has a square base. Even in the pictures in the PHB, they have square bases. The rules state that they have square bases. So, yes, round bases would be wrong. And, yeah, I agree with Merric that the only reason for round bases is aesthetic. By rules, it's not kosher. Now, as far as being bitter or whatever, I use round bases and I couldn't give a toss about the accuracy. :) Close enough is more than good enough for me. A 15 foot wide monster can fit in a 15 foot wide corridor regardless of what that battlemap might say. But, we're not talking about my game or your game. We're talking about what the rules ACTUALLY say. I've talked to Hypersmurf far too many times to think that my personal interpretation of the rules is going to hold any water. RAW states that a huge monster has a base 15 feet to a side. That means a 9x9 base using 5 foot squares. That means you get weirdness all over the place. That's my only point in all of this. That 3.5 1-2-1 rules are not any more particularly accurate or realistic than any other abstraction. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Non-Euclidean Geometry in 4E?
Top