Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Czhorat" data-source="post: 1266619" data-attributes="member: 13826"><p>It looks as if the actual situation is less interesting than we'd been guessing. I, for one, assumed that by "armed men" you meant some kind of militia or other law-enforcement who would be expected to help defend an innocent victim. If they were locals, wanderers, and other strangers who happen to be armed the situation is far less clear. For all they knew, racial hatred could be very common here; perhaps the locals, once alerted, would join in the beating. Perhaps they'd turn on the PCs for thinking about coming to the aid of of of "them". The point is that interfering just got a whole lot more risky and difficult. I still think that a good character would have tried to do something, but no longer think a neutral character would be compelled to help. It just seemed that the result is too questionable.</p></blockquote><p></p>