Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Zappo" data-source="post: 1308708" data-attributes="member: 633">It depends on the reasons for the PC's inaction; if he is a natural coward and was just frozen by fear, then it's neutral IMO; if he enjoyed the sight, then it's very evil; if he knew he would draw enemies to himself, or have to pay for the service of the armed men, then it's probably neutral. If, as it seems, the PC just stood there because he doesn't care and thinks it's none of his business, then I'd say slightly evil. Not enough for an alignment change, but more than enough for a loss of paladin abilities, for example. Further, if the assassin looked like he could be a threat to the PC, then I'd say neutral. Noone is evil for not being a hero, IMO.Nudges the action slightly towards neutral. If the character actually feels remorseful for letting that happen, it could bring it to neutral (and, for example, reduce the magnitude of the paladin power loss).I have no clue; if he was following the victim there has to be something more going on that complicates the morality of the situation. For what I know, the victim could be a tanar'ri in Sigil. Legally allowed, but not even a paladin would be expected to protect him.</blockquote>