Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Non-scaling attack bonuses... does it work?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wik" data-source="post: 5059538" data-attributes="member: 40177"><p>I have an idea for some house rule variants for 4e, and I was wondering if others have already done this before I try to tackle the math. Here's my basic idea:</p><p></p><p>* Get rid of the "half level bonus on skill checks, attack rolls, and defences" rule.</p><p>* Keep the "improve your ability scores every 4th level" rule</p><p>* Keep normal monster and PC hit point and damage values</p><p>* Lose all feats that grant an attack or defence bonus, but keep powers that do likewise.</p><p>* No magical item bonuses to attack or defences... but possibly keep the damage bonus (or maybe not). </p><p>* Rewrite monster defence values to fit this scale (see below).</p><p></p><p>Okay, so a few touches I'd add to this, as well. First, there would be six "tiers": Low Heroic, High Heroic, Low Paragon, High Paragon, Low Epic, and High Epic, with monster defence values based on which "tier" they were at (so I could ad-lib a monster's defences based on his role and level rather quickly).</p><p></p><p>My question is, roughly what should those values be? How would we look at scaling attack bonuses?</p><p></p><p>The reason I like this idea is because I think the "half level" rule is silly, since it applies to both monsters and PCs... why not just get rid of it? With it being present, it means there is a relatively narrow range of monsters the PCs are capable of fighting (let's say level +/- 5?) at any one time. 10th level PCs against a bunch of goblins just mean the fight is going to take forever with no threat to the PCs, while 1st level PCs against a 10th level monster is impossible (the monster will always hit, and the PCs will always miss). </p><p></p><p>I guess I'd just like to see an even flatter scale to PC progression in relation to monster strength, and was wondering how to figure out monster defence values. </p><p></p><p>So, to repeat my question: What should the defence values of monsters be in such a setting? Should they remain at the same number, or should they slightly scale up (as higher level PCs will accrue higher attack bonuses just from increasing ability scores and benefits from companions)?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wik, post: 5059538, member: 40177"] I have an idea for some house rule variants for 4e, and I was wondering if others have already done this before I try to tackle the math. Here's my basic idea: * Get rid of the "half level bonus on skill checks, attack rolls, and defences" rule. * Keep the "improve your ability scores every 4th level" rule * Keep normal monster and PC hit point and damage values * Lose all feats that grant an attack or defence bonus, but keep powers that do likewise. * No magical item bonuses to attack or defences... but possibly keep the damage bonus (or maybe not). * Rewrite monster defence values to fit this scale (see below). Okay, so a few touches I'd add to this, as well. First, there would be six "tiers": Low Heroic, High Heroic, Low Paragon, High Paragon, Low Epic, and High Epic, with monster defence values based on which "tier" they were at (so I could ad-lib a monster's defences based on his role and level rather quickly). My question is, roughly what should those values be? How would we look at scaling attack bonuses? The reason I like this idea is because I think the "half level" rule is silly, since it applies to both monsters and PCs... why not just get rid of it? With it being present, it means there is a relatively narrow range of monsters the PCs are capable of fighting (let's say level +/- 5?) at any one time. 10th level PCs against a bunch of goblins just mean the fight is going to take forever with no threat to the PCs, while 1st level PCs against a 10th level monster is impossible (the monster will always hit, and the PCs will always miss). I guess I'd just like to see an even flatter scale to PC progression in relation to monster strength, and was wondering how to figure out monster defence values. So, to repeat my question: What should the defence values of monsters be in such a setting? Should they remain at the same number, or should they slightly scale up (as higher level PCs will accrue higher attack bonuses just from increasing ability scores and benefits from companions)? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Non-scaling attack bonuses... does it work?
Top