Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Non-Square Minis?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dire Bare" data-source="post: 5281815" data-attributes="member: 18182"><p>Wha? Auld Grump, you and Verdande have perplexed me in this thread. WotC's assumption that creatures are square? That makes no sense. This may not be your intent, but these comments just sound like taking potshots at everybody's favorite company to hate for no real reason.</p><p></p><p>The vast majority of ALL miniatures made for gaming today come on either perfectly square or perfectly circular bases, not just those by WotC. The size of the square/circle bases vary, but each character and creature is designed to fit onto the base, perhaps hanging over some part of it. And each base, fits within a square . . .</p><p></p><p>Horses and other "cavalry" are a great exception, creatures that are "long". You can put them on square or round bases, but they also fit just fine on "cavalry" bases that are usually 1x2 "squares". In fact, many characters and creatures, including those from WotC, can easily be removed from their "forced" square/round bases and mounted on a cavalry base. </p><p></p><p>There are some easy examples in the Heroscape D&D line, which doesn't use square/round bases for "large" creatures, the line uses cavalry bases. And the figures are reprints from the standard D&D minis line.</p><p></p><p>Also, most of the miniatures that come on "broccoli" bases don't really break the "square" mold . . . . as they usually still fit just fine within the standard 1" square space on a battlemat. They're just minis mounted on circles with the extra bits of the circle trimmed away, in a fashion.</p><p></p><p>So . . . for the OP, it's not the shape of the base nor the scale of the miniatures that is a problem . . . it's the fact that most minis from any company fit rather neatly into a "square" on a battlemat? That's a complaint I've never heard before, and will be surprised if I ever hear again!</p><p></p><p>For minis that go "beyond the square" . . . you're really looking at cavalry and asymmetrical monsters, and that's about it, IME.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dire Bare, post: 5281815, member: 18182"] Wha? Auld Grump, you and Verdande have perplexed me in this thread. WotC's assumption that creatures are square? That makes no sense. This may not be your intent, but these comments just sound like taking potshots at everybody's favorite company to hate for no real reason. The vast majority of ALL miniatures made for gaming today come on either perfectly square or perfectly circular bases, not just those by WotC. The size of the square/circle bases vary, but each character and creature is designed to fit onto the base, perhaps hanging over some part of it. And each base, fits within a square . . . Horses and other "cavalry" are a great exception, creatures that are "long". You can put them on square or round bases, but they also fit just fine on "cavalry" bases that are usually 1x2 "squares". In fact, many characters and creatures, including those from WotC, can easily be removed from their "forced" square/round bases and mounted on a cavalry base. There are some easy examples in the Heroscape D&D line, which doesn't use square/round bases for "large" creatures, the line uses cavalry bases. And the figures are reprints from the standard D&D minis line. Also, most of the miniatures that come on "broccoli" bases don't really break the "square" mold . . . . as they usually still fit just fine within the standard 1" square space on a battlemat. They're just minis mounted on circles with the extra bits of the circle trimmed away, in a fashion. So . . . for the OP, it's not the shape of the base nor the scale of the miniatures that is a problem . . . it's the fact that most minis from any company fit rather neatly into a "square" on a battlemat? That's a complaint I've never heard before, and will be surprised if I ever hear again! For minis that go "beyond the square" . . . you're really looking at cavalry and asymmetrical monsters, and that's about it, IME. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Non-Square Minis?
Top