Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Nonsensical Ramblings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Morlock" data-source="post: 6576099" data-attributes="member: 6776981"><p>I wish...</p><p></p><p>D&D were still mostly black and white. I know, what an odd thing to say, right? I mean, everybody prefers color art to black and white. So do I, usually. But not the color art in D&D 3, 4, and 5. I haven't seen the MM in print form yet, but I'm searching up images on the Web. So far they're all just the creature, floating on a white background. I can't say if it's the artists they used, or the art direction ("gimme just a cutout on a white background"), or both, but I'll take the B&W stuff from 1e any day. Even the crappy stuff. It had backgrounds. It had blacks. Here, check this out:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-JyVBm7_Q1yM/UGK01eT2X5I/AAAAAAAAAk8/EgbpvMeNrbg/s1600/Kobold+Monster+Manual.jpg" target="_blank">http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-JyVBm7_Q1yM/UGK01eT2X5I/AAAAAAAAAk8/EgbpvMeNrbg/s1600/Kobold+Monster+Manual.jpg</a></p><p></p><p>It's one of the better illustrations from one of the crappier 1e artists, DCS. Okay, so the guy was never going to win any awards. But, it's "real" for me. I relax my eyes a bit, and that critter is right there in my mind's eye. I'm about to be pulled into that illustration with him. And he doesn't have anime feet (I friggin' hate anime style. Especially the big stupid feet*).</p><p></p><p>It's not nostalgia. It's mood. It's style. I don't think it's nostalgia. I like very little of the "old school" art I've seen in products marketed toward old school nostalgia, anyway. And I'd like to see work in that style from much better artists than DCS ever was; I can see much room for improvement in the 1e art.</p><p></p><p>Heck, I even like this guy better than the stuff I see nowadays, totally wrecking my argument about backgrounds:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-GTZgxXxFs_A/UGK1V_8VYMI/AAAAAAAAAlE/zYYqxcAw3gU/s1600/Duergar.JPG" target="_blank">http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-GTZgxXxFs_A/UGK1V_8VYMI/AAAAAAAAAlE/zYYqxcAw3gU/s1600/Duergar.JPG</a></p><p></p><p>Spotted blacks, baby. And an axe that looks like something a mortal could swing. A physique that looks like it was dreamed up by a guy who'd never heard of steroids. Armor and kit that look like your average Duergar could afford them. And despite all that, he's evocative for me in a way practically no 3/4/5e art is.</p><p></p><p>Maybe - just thinking out loud here...but maybe the old B&W stuff leaves more room for my imagination? Maybe the new stuff is TOO well-rendered? Check this guy out:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/forgottenrealms/images/2/29/Carrion_crawler_-_David_Griffith.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20090519101127" target="_blank">http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/forgottenrealms/images/2/29/Carrion_crawler_-_David_Griffith.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20090519101127</a></p><p></p><p>Me? I'm not getting anywhere near that thing. Eff...YOU. YOU kill it. Maybe I can sit in the back row and shoot arrows at it.</p><p></p><p>But this guy?:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-qNa2cdPsB0Y/UTS2Z-xDKXI/AAAAAAAAFi0/W_7N6sIMD4E/s1600/carrion_crawler-205x300.gif" target="_blank">http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-qNa2cdPsB0Y/UTS2Z-xDKXI/AAAAAAAAFi0/W_7N6sIMD4E/s1600/carrion_crawler-205x300.gif</a></p><p><a href="https://alastairsavage.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/carrion-crawler2.jpg" target="_blank">https://alastairsavage.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/carrion-crawler2.jpg</a></p><p></p><p>Yeah, okay, I can see that. Somebody hand me a sword. Rabbit stew, comin' up. Hideous? Yeah. Nightmarish? Sure. But doable. Gimme a coat of mail and a spear and it's go time.</p><p></p><p>But now I don't even know what I'm on about. The color crawler is definitely the better illustration, by far. But I'd still rather see a book illustrated in the style of the B&W one. Does that make any sense at all?</p><p></p><p>A vampire elf, whatever that is:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.lomion.de/cmm/img/vampelf.gif" target="_blank">http://www.lomion.de/cmm/img/vampelf.gif</a></p><p></p><p>I prefer this style. And OMG, did I just say I preferred a Baxa piece? Because I friggin' HATE Baxa's work. Always have. But...it's got a swamp. And trees. And a background. And a swirly cloak with some artistic flair, and not a lot of detail.</p><p></p><p>This is a vampire, my friend:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/79/Vampire_%28Dungeons_%26_Dragons%29.JPG" target="_blank">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/79/Vampire_(Dungeons_&_Dragons).JPG</a></p><p></p><p>And this:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://vampires.monstrous.com/gallery/albums/C4/normal_Larry_Elmore_TWO_FOrtheroad1985.jpg" target="_blank">http://vampires.monstrous.com/gallery/albums/C4/normal_Larry_Elmore_TWO_FOrtheroad1985.jpg</a></p><p></p><p>(I searched for Elmore's excellent B&W vampire illustration from the Expert BECMI book but came up empty)</p><p></p><p>She's pretty cool, though:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.ironrealms.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/250-wide/story/images/vampire.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.ironrealms.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/250-wide/story/images/vampire.jpg</a></p><p></p><p>Check out the cover to Astonishing Swordsmen & Sorcerers of Hyperborea:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://i408.photobucket.com/albums/pp161/ghul576/Hyperborea_resized.jpg" target="_blank">http://i408.photobucket.com/albums/pp161/ghul576/Hyperborea_resized.jpg</a></p><p></p><p>Badass. Not that good a draftsman, but still badass. Oozes atmosphere. Looks like actual paint, too (imagine that). Love the whatever-that-is on the axe, staff, and corpse.</p><p></p><p>I'm not really a fan of the sword and sandals aesthetic, but still, D&D could use a makeover to look more like that.</p><p></p><p>And this:</p><p><a href="http://www.dorktower.com/files/2014/03/PlayersHandbook8Cover.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.dorktower.com/files/2014/03/PlayersHandbook8Cover.jpg</a></p><p></p><p>And this:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.dorktower.com/files/2014/03/david-trampier-01-225x300.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.dorktower.com/files/2014/03/david-trampier-01-225x300.jpg</a></p><p></p><p>And this:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xx12LpWFdag/UxPX8y1nPzI/AAAAAAAAAeY/eE1Eqxkho3M/s1600/pic547353.jpg" target="_blank">http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xx12LpWFdag/UxPX8y1nPzI/AAAAAAAAAeY/eE1Eqxkho3M/s1600/pic547353.jpg</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>I guess it's as much about mood, as anything else. When I crack open a D&D book, I want some dark. And I don't mean spikey armor. I mean a world with dark spaces. Shadows. Parts I can't see clearly. Through a glass darkly.</p><p></p><p>Hey, never mind that I look at the 1e books and see a ton of crap that I'd never put into a book I was publishing. I still prefer the heights of that style to the style of 3/4/5. Maybe it is nostalgia, because I clearly left any rational argument somewhere behind me. I'm not nostalgic about the rules. I much prefer higher AC being better, thank you very much (on the other hand, I also prefer faster, simpler rules).</p><p></p><p>I guess art is like music. Whatever you liked best when you were a teenager is what you like best forever. Like the man said, I know it when I see it.</p><p></p><p>This is a DM:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.blackgate.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/jeff-easley-16.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.blackgate.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/jeff-easley-16.jpg</a></p><p></p><p>P.S., yes, I love Trampier (love me some Roslof, Caldwell, Elmore, Easley, Whelan, Parkinson, Nicholson, Holloway, and Angus McBride, too). Something about his woodcut style, like I'm looking at an ancient manuscript from a master. Someone else put it well:</p><p></p><p>"I've always considered Trampier's style one of the most evocative of a sense of wonder, foreboding and all the more immersive because of that feeling. The facial expression, textures, and embedded narrative in even a single figure are a touchstone for fantasy art. Any of his illustrations could be a single frame from a key moment in a film, part of a continuous stream of images that your mind can almost fill in to either side of the single image before you."</p><p></p><p>Another great quote:</p><p></p><p>"Even with the ability to instill the fantastic, it did appear that DAT enjoyed depicting the mundane as much as anything. I remember reading somewhere a quote from the amazing Keith Parkinson, something to the effect that “one must paint the backgrounds as if they are in the real world, that way that which is fantastic in the foreground can seem rooted in its own reality.” Trampier appeared to have his own philosophy in this respect, choosing to show the fantastic at its most normal. Instead of portraying the great hall of the Hill Giant Chief, he would rather put the activities of its kitchen on display. A man working a sharpening wheel for an Enchant an Item spell is just a man, not some great wizard imbibing a noble weapon with power. Even the heroes of the legendary cover to the Player’s Handbook are devoid of anything exotic or unique. This was a very interesting approach, one that was never lost on me – that sometimes the fantastic is not really that fantastic at all."</p><p></p><p>So true.</p><p></p><p>***</p><p></p><p>* liar liar, pants on fire:</p><p><a href="http://fierydragon.com/dragonsbreath/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/CloudGiantTrampier.gif" target="_blank">http://fierydragon.com/dragonsbreath/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/CloudGiantTrampier.gif</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Morlock, post: 6576099, member: 6776981"] I wish... D&D were still mostly black and white. I know, what an odd thing to say, right? I mean, everybody prefers color art to black and white. So do I, usually. But not the color art in D&D 3, 4, and 5. I haven't seen the MM in print form yet, but I'm searching up images on the Web. So far they're all just the creature, floating on a white background. I can't say if it's the artists they used, or the art direction ("gimme just a cutout on a white background"), or both, but I'll take the B&W stuff from 1e any day. Even the crappy stuff. It had backgrounds. It had blacks. Here, check this out: [url]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-JyVBm7_Q1yM/UGK01eT2X5I/AAAAAAAAAk8/EgbpvMeNrbg/s1600/Kobold+Monster+Manual.jpg[/url] It's one of the better illustrations from one of the crappier 1e artists, DCS. Okay, so the guy was never going to win any awards. But, it's "real" for me. I relax my eyes a bit, and that critter is right there in my mind's eye. I'm about to be pulled into that illustration with him. And he doesn't have anime feet (I friggin' hate anime style. Especially the big stupid feet*). It's not nostalgia. It's mood. It's style. I don't think it's nostalgia. I like very little of the "old school" art I've seen in products marketed toward old school nostalgia, anyway. And I'd like to see work in that style from much better artists than DCS ever was; I can see much room for improvement in the 1e art. Heck, I even like this guy better than the stuff I see nowadays, totally wrecking my argument about backgrounds: [url]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-GTZgxXxFs_A/UGK1V_8VYMI/AAAAAAAAAlE/zYYqxcAw3gU/s1600/Duergar.JPG[/url] Spotted blacks, baby. And an axe that looks like something a mortal could swing. A physique that looks like it was dreamed up by a guy who'd never heard of steroids. Armor and kit that look like your average Duergar could afford them. And despite all that, he's evocative for me in a way practically no 3/4/5e art is. Maybe - just thinking out loud here...but maybe the old B&W stuff leaves more room for my imagination? Maybe the new stuff is TOO well-rendered? Check this guy out: [url]http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/forgottenrealms/images/2/29/Carrion_crawler_-_David_Griffith.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20090519101127[/url] Me? I'm not getting anywhere near that thing. Eff...YOU. YOU kill it. Maybe I can sit in the back row and shoot arrows at it. But this guy?: [url]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-qNa2cdPsB0Y/UTS2Z-xDKXI/AAAAAAAAFi0/W_7N6sIMD4E/s1600/carrion_crawler-205x300.gif[/url] [url]https://alastairsavage.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/carrion-crawler2.jpg[/url] Yeah, okay, I can see that. Somebody hand me a sword. Rabbit stew, comin' up. Hideous? Yeah. Nightmarish? Sure. But doable. Gimme a coat of mail and a spear and it's go time. But now I don't even know what I'm on about. The color crawler is definitely the better illustration, by far. But I'd still rather see a book illustrated in the style of the B&W one. Does that make any sense at all? A vampire elf, whatever that is: [url]http://www.lomion.de/cmm/img/vampelf.gif[/url] I prefer this style. And OMG, did I just say I preferred a Baxa piece? Because I friggin' HATE Baxa's work. Always have. But...it's got a swamp. And trees. And a background. And a swirly cloak with some artistic flair, and not a lot of detail. This is a vampire, my friend: [url]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/79/Vampire_%28Dungeons_%26_Dragons%29.JPG[/url] And this: [url]http://vampires.monstrous.com/gallery/albums/C4/normal_Larry_Elmore_TWO_FOrtheroad1985.jpg[/url] (I searched for Elmore's excellent B&W vampire illustration from the Expert BECMI book but came up empty) She's pretty cool, though: [url]http://www.ironrealms.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/250-wide/story/images/vampire.jpg[/url] Check out the cover to Astonishing Swordsmen & Sorcerers of Hyperborea: [url]http://i408.photobucket.com/albums/pp161/ghul576/Hyperborea_resized.jpg[/url] Badass. Not that good a draftsman, but still badass. Oozes atmosphere. Looks like actual paint, too (imagine that). Love the whatever-that-is on the axe, staff, and corpse. I'm not really a fan of the sword and sandals aesthetic, but still, D&D could use a makeover to look more like that. And this: [url]http://www.dorktower.com/files/2014/03/PlayersHandbook8Cover.jpg[/url] And this: [url]http://www.dorktower.com/files/2014/03/david-trampier-01-225x300.jpg[/url] And this: [url]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xx12LpWFdag/UxPX8y1nPzI/AAAAAAAAAeY/eE1Eqxkho3M/s1600/pic547353.jpg[/url] I guess it's as much about mood, as anything else. When I crack open a D&D book, I want some dark. And I don't mean spikey armor. I mean a world with dark spaces. Shadows. Parts I can't see clearly. Through a glass darkly. Hey, never mind that I look at the 1e books and see a ton of crap that I'd never put into a book I was publishing. I still prefer the heights of that style to the style of 3/4/5. Maybe it is nostalgia, because I clearly left any rational argument somewhere behind me. I'm not nostalgic about the rules. I much prefer higher AC being better, thank you very much (on the other hand, I also prefer faster, simpler rules). I guess art is like music. Whatever you liked best when you were a teenager is what you like best forever. Like the man said, I know it when I see it. This is a DM: [url]http://www.blackgate.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/jeff-easley-16.jpg[/url] P.S., yes, I love Trampier (love me some Roslof, Caldwell, Elmore, Easley, Whelan, Parkinson, Nicholson, Holloway, and Angus McBride, too). Something about his woodcut style, like I'm looking at an ancient manuscript from a master. Someone else put it well: "I've always considered Trampier's style one of the most evocative of a sense of wonder, foreboding and all the more immersive because of that feeling. The facial expression, textures, and embedded narrative in even a single figure are a touchstone for fantasy art. Any of his illustrations could be a single frame from a key moment in a film, part of a continuous stream of images that your mind can almost fill in to either side of the single image before you." Another great quote: "Even with the ability to instill the fantastic, it did appear that DAT enjoyed depicting the mundane as much as anything. I remember reading somewhere a quote from the amazing Keith Parkinson, something to the effect that “one must paint the backgrounds as if they are in the real world, that way that which is fantastic in the foreground can seem rooted in its own reality.” Trampier appeared to have his own philosophy in this respect, choosing to show the fantastic at its most normal. Instead of portraying the great hall of the Hill Giant Chief, he would rather put the activities of its kitchen on display. A man working a sharpening wheel for an Enchant an Item spell is just a man, not some great wizard imbibing a noble weapon with power. Even the heroes of the legendary cover to the Player’s Handbook are devoid of anything exotic or unique. This was a very interesting approach, one that was never lost on me – that sometimes the fantastic is not really that fantastic at all." So true. *** * liar liar, pants on fire: [url]http://fierydragon.com/dragonsbreath/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/CloudGiantTrampier.gif[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Nonsensical Ramblings
Top