Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Normal Distribution Ability Scores
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ezo" data-source="post: 9494591" data-attributes="member: 7037866"><p>I agree with others this is an overly taxing concept of INT 6.</p><p></p><p>Although antiquated and flawed, such an INT could represent someone with as low as I.Q. 70 (but probably a bit higher), just above the threshold of what was considered disabled. There are many people who function in society with such conditions.</p><p></p><p>In 5E terms, the -2 penalty associated with scores of 6 or 7 are immediately offset by proficiency in a task, putting such an individal on par with another with scores 10 or 11 but without proficiency.</p><p></p><p>STR 6 can carry 30 lbs without issue (which many people can do, even my parents in their 80's), even with the variant options.</p><p>DEX 6 person would range from very clumsy to poor eyesight or whatever. Again, many individuals function fine with such a score.</p><p>CON 6 is only really an issue due to its tie to HP. But really, even that is not impossible to play with. A fighter with CON 6 has basically the same hp as a wizard with CON 10. A ranged fighter with decent AC would play fine IMO. Also, the <em>tough</em> feat can offset the HP loss. </p><p>WIS 6 is slow to pick up cue and lacks sense and understanding of the world around them. LOL I know a LOT of people like that! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p>CHA 6 could range from poor social graces or lack of confidence or such. Again, plenty of people like that in the RPGing world...</p><p></p><p>Even a score below 6 is not by any means a death sentence to a PC and does emphasize the difference between themselves and an 18 score person.</p><p></p><p>I will grant you a combination of 6's in scores would make things very difficult, especially if another score is not exceedingly high to allow the PC a focus area. It isn't impossible to make such a character work, but you will more heavily rely on the support of the team--but is that really a bad thing in a team game?</p><p></p><p></p><p>No, an 8 score is just below average, well above the realm of any sort of mental impairment. You're no Einstein, of course, but you would rarely, if ever, have difficulty living day-to-day.</p><p></p><p>Even if an INT 6 was the "village blockhead" or something, they would not be "sold as a slave in the middle ages." You're basically Forrest Gump IIRC or possibly a bit smarter. Due to INT scores being discrete, an INT 6 could represent an IQ 80 even.</p><p></p><p>Rolling 3d6 you would have to roll a 3 to be within the bottom 1st-percentile. In IQ scores, this is around a 60 and finally at the point you're considering an INT 6 in your more extreme statements.</p><p></p><p>You <em>really</em> are taking that a bit too far IMO. But, I don't intend to convince you, simply inform you that most people IMO will disagree with your assessment.</p><p></p><p>Finally, Intelligence comprises such a large range of factors (which is why IQ is not a reliable metric!) that someone with an INT 6 might have a very poor memory, forgetting things easily, but be relatively average in other factors of Intelligence, so the score "as a whole" averages to INT 6.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ezo, post: 9494591, member: 7037866"] I agree with others this is an overly taxing concept of INT 6. Although antiquated and flawed, such an INT could represent someone with as low as I.Q. 70 (but probably a bit higher), just above the threshold of what was considered disabled. There are many people who function in society with such conditions. In 5E terms, the -2 penalty associated with scores of 6 or 7 are immediately offset by proficiency in a task, putting such an individal on par with another with scores 10 or 11 but without proficiency. STR 6 can carry 30 lbs without issue (which many people can do, even my parents in their 80's), even with the variant options. DEX 6 person would range from very clumsy to poor eyesight or whatever. Again, many individuals function fine with such a score. CON 6 is only really an issue due to its tie to HP. But really, even that is not impossible to play with. A fighter with CON 6 has basically the same hp as a wizard with CON 10. A ranged fighter with decent AC would play fine IMO. Also, the [I]tough[/I] feat can offset the HP loss. WIS 6 is slow to pick up cue and lacks sense and understanding of the world around them. LOL I know a LOT of people like that! ;) CHA 6 could range from poor social graces or lack of confidence or such. Again, plenty of people like that in the RPGing world... Even a score below 6 is not by any means a death sentence to a PC and does emphasize the difference between themselves and an 18 score person. I will grant you a combination of 6's in scores would make things very difficult, especially if another score is not exceedingly high to allow the PC a focus area. It isn't impossible to make such a character work, but you will more heavily rely on the support of the team--but is that really a bad thing in a team game? No, an 8 score is just below average, well above the realm of any sort of mental impairment. You're no Einstein, of course, but you would rarely, if ever, have difficulty living day-to-day. Even if an INT 6 was the "village blockhead" or something, they would not be "sold as a slave in the middle ages." You're basically Forrest Gump IIRC or possibly a bit smarter. Due to INT scores being discrete, an INT 6 could represent an IQ 80 even. Rolling 3d6 you would have to roll a 3 to be within the bottom 1st-percentile. In IQ scores, this is around a 60 and finally at the point you're considering an INT 6 in your more extreme statements. You [I]really[/I] are taking that a bit too far IMO. But, I don't intend to convince you, simply inform you that most people IMO will disagree with your assessment. Finally, Intelligence comprises such a large range of factors (which is why IQ is not a reliable metric!) that someone with an INT 6 might have a very poor memory, forgetting things easily, but be relatively average in other factors of Intelligence, so the score "as a whole" averages to INT 6. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Normal Distribution Ability Scores
Top