Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Not a Conspiracy Theory: Moving Toward Better Criticism in RPGs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Campbell" data-source="post: 8936570" data-attributes="member: 16586"><p>I agree. No one should expect special deference. I don't really care whatever framing anyone wants to use. If I disagree with the content of what is said I will say why. I do not care to control the language is used because when people use language Schrodinger's X or Bespoke Game the issue isn't the language that is being used. It's the implications of that language. It belies either a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of what play really looks like and I can engage it on that level. I am willing to have those hard conversations.</p><p></p><p>Despite what some people here might think I do not consider myself an advocate for any given way to play. I want people to play the games that suit them the best - to seek their personal bliss. I also want people to not feel ashamed of their preferences, to not let others bully them as I was bullied and shamed into believing what I wanted out of play was impossible, selfish even. That I did not deserve to have the game experience I wanted to have. Of course all of that was BS.</p><p></p><p>I don't care what games or methods of play anyone prefers. What I want, what I have always wanted was clarity and accuracy of play process. My personal motivation for posting on these boards is to instill a climate of respect for things we do not personally desire. No matter your preference you should be able to look at a well designed game that gives people an experience they cannot find elsewhere and respect it. You should be able to respect the skill and creativity of anyone who dedicates years to become excellent at running a given type of game. </p><p></p><p>We should be able to talk about these things from the basis that any given game provides unique value and that no set of preferences are wrong or threatening. Will things get touchy sometimes? Sure. We're going to see things differently. That's life. But we should at least be able to respect each other.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Campbell, post: 8936570, member: 16586"] I agree. No one should expect special deference. I don't really care whatever framing anyone wants to use. If I disagree with the content of what is said I will say why. I do not care to control the language is used because when people use language Schrodinger's X or Bespoke Game the issue isn't the language that is being used. It's the implications of that language. It belies either a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of what play really looks like and I can engage it on that level. I am willing to have those hard conversations. Despite what some people here might think I do not consider myself an advocate for any given way to play. I want people to play the games that suit them the best - to seek their personal bliss. I also want people to not feel ashamed of their preferences, to not let others bully them as I was bullied and shamed into believing what I wanted out of play was impossible, selfish even. That I did not deserve to have the game experience I wanted to have. Of course all of that was BS. I don't care what games or methods of play anyone prefers. What I want, what I have always wanted was clarity and accuracy of play process. My personal motivation for posting on these boards is to instill a climate of respect for things we do not personally desire. No matter your preference you should be able to look at a well designed game that gives people an experience they cannot find elsewhere and respect it. You should be able to respect the skill and creativity of anyone who dedicates years to become excellent at running a given type of game. We should be able to talk about these things from the basis that any given game provides unique value and that no set of preferences are wrong or threatening. Will things get touchy sometimes? Sure. We're going to see things differently. That's life. But we should at least be able to respect each other. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Not a Conspiracy Theory: Moving Toward Better Criticism in RPGs
Top