Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Not a Conspiracy Theory: Moving Toward Better Criticism in RPGs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 8937300" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>What I take [USER=22779]@Hussar[/USER] to be describing is a type of RPG play I've experienced. For me it was back in the 90s, and the system was AD&D, mostly 2nd ed.</p><p></p><p>But I get the impression that there is (or has been) 3E and 5e play that is similar, and maybe also 4e play.</p><p></p><p>What I have in mind is an approach to play where the GM has a dungeon map, and associated key, which basically provides a series of scenes to frame. The players, at the end of each scene, say which corridor their PCs go down, or which door they open, or some similar sort of action declaration related to moving the PCs through the dungeon, and as a a result of this the GM frames the appropriate new scene (as indicated by the map and key).</p><p></p><p>The players are not particularly setting out to exercise control over which scenes are framed - eg they're not using a lot of divination magic, or scouting, or rumour collection, to try and learn in advance what is behind each door or down each corridor so that they can exercise control over which scene is framed by choosing where to have their PCs go in the dungeon. In this respect, therefore, the play is different from what Gygax describes in his PHB, where he emphasises the idea that players <em>should</em> be seeking information and doing their best to exercise control over what it is that their PCs encounter.</p><p></p><p>In the sort of non-Gygaxian play that I am describing, and that I take Hussar to be describing, the players trust the GM to have put interesting stuff into the dungeon rooms, which therefore will produce interesting scenes (encounters) when they are activated. There might be an overarching theme to some of these (eg this sequence of room is all Gnolls), maybe even extending over the whole dungeon (eg it's a series of old catacombs repurposed by Gnolls, and so we have undead in some room, Gnolls and their demonic temples in some rooms, and a few rooms that have more-or-less random odds and sods that have made their way into the dungeon, like say a Choker in one and a giant spider with its webs in another). But whatever exactly its extent and consistency, the theme is mostly for fun, maybe a bit of player-side prep (eg it's catacombs, and so there are probably undead, and so the cleric prepares Protection form Evil) and it also gives the GM a bit of guidance for how to narrate random encounters and otherwise fill in any dungeon dressing that comes up in play, but that's about it. Maybe there's also a reason why the PCs are in the dungeon - eg to retrieve a MacGuffin - but that's not really the main point of play. It's closer to a plot device or even perhaps a fig leaf to put a veneer of story logic over the fact that the real point of play is to have fun moving the characters through the dungeon from encounter to encounter.</p><p></p><p>Now [USER=22779]@Hussar[/USER] can tell me if I've got the wrong impression, but this is the sort of play I take him to be describing. And in this sort of play, it is largely arbitrary or "guesswork" which way the players go and which doors they open. Because the real point of those action declarations is to activate the appropriate scene (as per the map and key), and ideally any of them will be fun for the players.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 8937300, member: 42582"] What I take [USER=22779]@Hussar[/USER] to be describing is a type of RPG play I've experienced. For me it was back in the 90s, and the system was AD&D, mostly 2nd ed. But I get the impression that there is (or has been) 3E and 5e play that is similar, and maybe also 4e play. What I have in mind is an approach to play where the GM has a dungeon map, and associated key, which basically provides a series of scenes to frame. The players, at the end of each scene, say which corridor their PCs go down, or which door they open, or some similar sort of action declaration related to moving the PCs through the dungeon, and as a a result of this the GM frames the appropriate new scene (as indicated by the map and key). The players are not particularly setting out to exercise control over which scenes are framed - eg they're not using a lot of divination magic, or scouting, or rumour collection, to try and learn in advance what is behind each door or down each corridor so that they can exercise control over which scene is framed by choosing where to have their PCs go in the dungeon. In this respect, therefore, the play is different from what Gygax describes in his PHB, where he emphasises the idea that players [i]should[/i] be seeking information and doing their best to exercise control over what it is that their PCs encounter. In the sort of non-Gygaxian play that I am describing, and that I take Hussar to be describing, the players trust the GM to have put interesting stuff into the dungeon rooms, which therefore will produce interesting scenes (encounters) when they are activated. There might be an overarching theme to some of these (eg this sequence of room is all Gnolls), maybe even extending over the whole dungeon (eg it's a series of old catacombs repurposed by Gnolls, and so we have undead in some room, Gnolls and their demonic temples in some rooms, and a few rooms that have more-or-less random odds and sods that have made their way into the dungeon, like say a Choker in one and a giant spider with its webs in another). But whatever exactly its extent and consistency, the theme is mostly for fun, maybe a bit of player-side prep (eg it's catacombs, and so there are probably undead, and so the cleric prepares Protection form Evil) and it also gives the GM a bit of guidance for how to narrate random encounters and otherwise fill in any dungeon dressing that comes up in play, but that's about it. Maybe there's also a reason why the PCs are in the dungeon - eg to retrieve a MacGuffin - but that's not really the main point of play. It's closer to a plot device or even perhaps a fig leaf to put a veneer of story logic over the fact that the real point of play is to have fun moving the characters through the dungeon from encounter to encounter. Now [USER=22779]@Hussar[/USER] can tell me if I've got the wrong impression, but this is the sort of play I take him to be describing. And in this sort of play, it is largely arbitrary or "guesswork" which way the players go and which doors they open. Because the real point of those action declarations is to activate the appropriate scene (as per the map and key), and ideally any of them will be fun for the players. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Not a Conspiracy Theory: Moving Toward Better Criticism in RPGs
Top