Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Not a Conspiracy Theory: Moving Toward Better Criticism in RPGs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 8941695" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>This doesn't seem to me like a very meaningful or insightful conclusion, TBH. That is, sure there are an 'infinite' number of incredibly minute variations on the following fiction. ALL of them must honor the agenda and, for the most part, live by the principles of play which the game (DW in this case I presume) espouses. Not only that, but the fiction has to follow from whatever came before, and that is a VERY strict constraint! </p><p></p><p>So, basically, yes, the player rolls an 8 while conducting the Volley move. Lets assume they choose "move into danger" as the complication. There is a tactical situation here. That situation is going to be fairly well-specified in most cases, so there's really a limited repertoire of threats. Most likely the GM is going to have another enemy deal damage to your character (fiction will be something on the order of a bad guy moving in on you, or the PC getting too close and getting hit). Conceivably there could also be environmental hazards that could come into play, but those are again going to be dictated by the FICTION, not so much the GM! Finally, maybe the situation might call for an entirely new and thus-far unanticipated danger (IE because nothing much else is available). AGAIN this is a constraint of FICTION, not a GM whim. Here we all agree, there are probably a lot of options, but consider there are hinted-at dangers, fronts, factions, and dungeon moves. Most of the time the GM should be drawing from these, as opposed to spinning off into lala land to invent something completely new.</p><p></p><p>In other words, I can tell you with some fairly high reliability things like "what is [USER=6696971]@Manbearcat[/USER] going to say happens here?" I won't likely be exactly right, but I know it will be one of a small menu of possibilities that meet certain well-established criteria. This is really no different from the sort of choices that GM's make in, say, classic D&D, when a player does something aside from 'make an attack' or some other established type of 'move'. The GM, constrained by various factors picks a response. In a few cases that might be directly based on pre-existing notes, but 99% of the time it won't be, certainly not entirely. </p><p></p><p>The real question though is, what ultimately is the worth of this kind of statement in the first place? Clearly "stuff happens which nobody anticipated" should be pretty routine in RPGs, right?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 8941695, member: 82106"] This doesn't seem to me like a very meaningful or insightful conclusion, TBH. That is, sure there are an 'infinite' number of incredibly minute variations on the following fiction. ALL of them must honor the agenda and, for the most part, live by the principles of play which the game (DW in this case I presume) espouses. Not only that, but the fiction has to follow from whatever came before, and that is a VERY strict constraint! So, basically, yes, the player rolls an 8 while conducting the Volley move. Lets assume they choose "move into danger" as the complication. There is a tactical situation here. That situation is going to be fairly well-specified in most cases, so there's really a limited repertoire of threats. Most likely the GM is going to have another enemy deal damage to your character (fiction will be something on the order of a bad guy moving in on you, or the PC getting too close and getting hit). Conceivably there could also be environmental hazards that could come into play, but those are again going to be dictated by the FICTION, not so much the GM! Finally, maybe the situation might call for an entirely new and thus-far unanticipated danger (IE because nothing much else is available). AGAIN this is a constraint of FICTION, not a GM whim. Here we all agree, there are probably a lot of options, but consider there are hinted-at dangers, fronts, factions, and dungeon moves. Most of the time the GM should be drawing from these, as opposed to spinning off into lala land to invent something completely new. In other words, I can tell you with some fairly high reliability things like "what is [USER=6696971]@Manbearcat[/USER] going to say happens here?" I won't likely be exactly right, but I know it will be one of a small menu of possibilities that meet certain well-established criteria. This is really no different from the sort of choices that GM's make in, say, classic D&D, when a player does something aside from 'make an attack' or some other established type of 'move'. The GM, constrained by various factors picks a response. In a few cases that might be directly based on pre-existing notes, but 99% of the time it won't be, certainly not entirely. The real question though is, what ultimately is the worth of this kind of statement in the first place? Clearly "stuff happens which nobody anticipated" should be pretty routine in RPGs, right? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Not a Conspiracy Theory: Moving Toward Better Criticism in RPGs
Top