Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Not a fan of the new Eldritch Knight
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="clearstream" data-source="post: 9527139" data-attributes="member: 71699"><p>Well, the text in the core books -- absent the Sage Advice -- states unambiguously that clerics and paladins may obviate their need for (inexpensive) <strong>M</strong>aterial components by putting their holy symbol on their shield, and that does not apply to <strong>S</strong>omatic components.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: rgb(235, 107, 86)">EDIT Following further discussion, I now believe that a spellcasting focus <em>by intent</em> covers both material components (that aren't costed or consumed) and somatic components.</span></p><p></p><p>So it seems inaccurate to characterise that as having "trouble reading the rules". The <em>actual words</em> lucidly state the maligned conclusion! Here is that text, for S and M components</p><h4><p style="margin-left: 20px">Somatic (S)</p> </h4> <p style="margin-left: 20px">A Somatic component is a forceful gesticulation or an intricate set of gestures. A spellcaster must use at least one of their hands to perform these movements.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><h4><p style="margin-left: 20px">Material (M)</p> </h4> <p style="margin-left: 20px">A Material component is a particular material used in a spell’s casting, as specified in parentheses in the Components entry. These materials aren’t consumed by the spell unless the spell’s description states otherwise. The spellcaster must have a hand free to access them, but it can be the same hand used to perform Somatic components, if any.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">If a spell doesn’t consume its materials and doesn’t specify a cost for them, a spellcaster can use a Component Pouch (see chapter 6) instead of providing the materials specified in the spell, or the spellcaster can substitute a Spellcasting Focus if the caster has a feature that allows that substitution. To use a Component Pouch, you must have a hand free to reach into it, and to use a Spellcasting Focus, you must hold it unless its description says otherwise (see chapter 6 for descriptions).</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p>For Clerics and Paladins</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><strong><em>Spellcasting Focus.</em></strong> You can use a Holy Symbol as a Spellcasting Focus for your Cleric spells.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p>For Warcaster to read that</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><strong><em>Somatic Components.</em></strong> You can perform the Somatic components of spells even when you have weapons or a Shield in one or both hands.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p>Very strongly implies that it cannot be done except where expressly afforded by a mechanic. Otherwise that part of the Warcaster text becomes (in effect) blank: the better reading sustains meaning in all parts of a text where possible.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: rgb(235, 107, 86)">EDIT The Warcaster text then has to be read as a panacea for characters without access to a spellcasting focus. Meaning I overstated this point as the feature is only <em>sometimes </em>irrelevant.</span></p><p></p><p>In the cited text, a spellcasting focus is tied to obviating M components. It takes a fairly strong misreading to interpret that otherwise. The Sage Advice indeed adds something new: expressly extending the effect of using a focus to cover S components. As I said above, given that the authors of 2024 text must have been aware of that Sage Advice, the fact it wasn't migrated into the core text implies (but doesn't prove) that it wasn't intended.</p><p></p><p>Caveat: that's based on text I've been able to find. Can you point to some text I've overlooked?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="clearstream, post: 9527139, member: 71699"] Well, the text in the core books -- absent the Sage Advice -- states unambiguously that clerics and paladins may obviate their need for (inexpensive) [B]M[/B]aterial components by putting their holy symbol on their shield, and that does not apply to [B]S[/B]omatic components. [COLOR=rgb(235, 107, 86)]EDIT Following further discussion, I now believe that a spellcasting focus [I]by intent[/I] covers both material components (that aren't costed or consumed) and somatic components.[/COLOR] So it seems inaccurate to characterise that as having "trouble reading the rules". The [I]actual words[/I] lucidly state the maligned conclusion! Here is that text, for S and M components [HEADING=3][INDENT]Somatic (S)[/INDENT][/HEADING] [INDENT]A Somatic component is a forceful gesticulation or an intricate set of gestures. A spellcaster must use at least one of their hands to perform these movements.[/INDENT] [INDENT][/INDENT] [HEADING=3][INDENT]Material (M)[/INDENT][/HEADING] [INDENT]A Material component is a particular material used in a spell’s casting, as specified in parentheses in the Components entry. These materials aren’t consumed by the spell unless the spell’s description states otherwise. The spellcaster must have a hand free to access them, but it can be the same hand used to perform Somatic components, if any.[/INDENT] [INDENT][/INDENT] [INDENT]If a spell doesn’t consume its materials and doesn’t specify a cost for them, a spellcaster can use a Component Pouch (see chapter 6) instead of providing the materials specified in the spell, or the spellcaster can substitute a Spellcasting Focus if the caster has a feature that allows that substitution. To use a Component Pouch, you must have a hand free to reach into it, and to use a Spellcasting Focus, you must hold it unless its description says otherwise (see chapter 6 for descriptions).[/INDENT] [INDENT][/INDENT] For Clerics and Paladins [INDENT][B][I]Spellcasting Focus.[/I][/B] You can use a Holy Symbol as a Spellcasting Focus for your Cleric spells.[/INDENT] [INDENT][/INDENT] For Warcaster to read that [INDENT][B][I]Somatic Components.[/I][/B] You can perform the Somatic components of spells even when you have weapons or a Shield in one or both hands.[/INDENT] [INDENT][/INDENT] Very strongly implies that it cannot be done except where expressly afforded by a mechanic. Otherwise that part of the Warcaster text becomes (in effect) blank: the better reading sustains meaning in all parts of a text where possible. [COLOR=rgb(235, 107, 86)]EDIT The Warcaster text then has to be read as a panacea for characters without access to a spellcasting focus. Meaning I overstated this point as the feature is only [I]sometimes [/I]irrelevant.[/COLOR] In the cited text, a spellcasting focus is tied to obviating M components. It takes a fairly strong misreading to interpret that otherwise. The Sage Advice indeed adds something new: expressly extending the effect of using a focus to cover S components. As I said above, given that the authors of 2024 text must have been aware of that Sage Advice, the fact it wasn't migrated into the core text implies (but doesn't prove) that it wasn't intended. Caveat: that's based on text I've been able to find. Can you point to some text I've overlooked? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Not a fan of the new Eldritch Knight
Top