Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Not a fan of the new Eldritch Knight
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheSword" data-source="post: 9869263" data-attributes="member: 6879661"><p>The mechanical effect may be the same between Friendly Attitude and Charm. However one is based on how a creature feels towards you and one brute forces this to over ride this against the persons will. That’s why they get a save against Charm Person. I dont understand how you can think that an effect that a person makes a save against somehow makes them willing. You haven’t changed how they think, you have bypassed it. We know this isn’t the case because when the spell ends the persons normal actions reassert and they don’t forget what they have done unless other magic is used to erase this.</p><p></p><p>I suspect we’re never going to agree on this, though, It’s a play style that’s an anathema to me. Luckily it is extremely rare outside of forums as it is usually impossible to find DMs willing to tolerate unlimited Magen, wish simulacrum loop or pet bound dragons. Such DMs are rare as hens teeth. However somehow we end up in this discussions as if these play styles are par for the course. Most DMs will say, you’ve ran out of quicksilver, or someone cast dispel magic, or there are no Duergar Stonelords to hand. Or possibly just… stop that at this table please.</p><p></p><p>These exploits normally rely on the assumption that if it is in a book that it is in the DMs game and lets be honest that is almost never the case. They’re the TTRPG equivalent of a computer game glitch. When it’s between you, your playstation and God, who cares if you get infinite XP. When this stuff hits a live table though it evaporates pretty quick because people just don’t tolerate it, unless they either enjoy the thought exercise of this too or are inexperienced. Either way it doesn’t unusually short lived.</p><p></p><p>You can absolutely do whatever you like at your table but I guess a lot of DMs - particularly new - will come to forums searching to see if something is accepted and normal and it’s really important that they see dissenting opinions and don’t feel obliged to accept this stuff as expected.</p><p></p><p>Using enchantments to override the Willing Creature requirement is definitely on the list of things DMs can push back on without feeling like they are being unfair.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheSword, post: 9869263, member: 6879661"] The mechanical effect may be the same between Friendly Attitude and Charm. However one is based on how a creature feels towards you and one brute forces this to over ride this against the persons will. That’s why they get a save against Charm Person. I dont understand how you can think that an effect that a person makes a save against somehow makes them willing. You haven’t changed how they think, you have bypassed it. We know this isn’t the case because when the spell ends the persons normal actions reassert and they don’t forget what they have done unless other magic is used to erase this. I suspect we’re never going to agree on this, though, It’s a play style that’s an anathema to me. Luckily it is extremely rare outside of forums as it is usually impossible to find DMs willing to tolerate unlimited Magen, wish simulacrum loop or pet bound dragons. Such DMs are rare as hens teeth. However somehow we end up in this discussions as if these play styles are par for the course. Most DMs will say, you’ve ran out of quicksilver, or someone cast dispel magic, or there are no Duergar Stonelords to hand. Or possibly just… stop that at this table please. These exploits normally rely on the assumption that if it is in a book that it is in the DMs game and lets be honest that is almost never the case. They’re the TTRPG equivalent of a computer game glitch. When it’s between you, your playstation and God, who cares if you get infinite XP. When this stuff hits a live table though it evaporates pretty quick because people just don’t tolerate it, unless they either enjoy the thought exercise of this too or are inexperienced. Either way it doesn’t unusually short lived. You can absolutely do whatever you like at your table but I guess a lot of DMs - particularly new - will come to forums searching to see if something is accepted and normal and it’s really important that they see dissenting opinions and don’t feel obliged to accept this stuff as expected. Using enchantments to override the Willing Creature requirement is definitely on the list of things DMs can push back on without feeling like they are being unfair. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Not a fan of the new Eldritch Knight
Top